SIL Assessment
About Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Assessment
Before the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) analysis team can make recommendations for actions that should be taken to mitigate risk for a given safety instrumented system, the team must first assign a numeric rating to each instrumented function within that safety instrumented system. The SIL is a numeric value that represents an overall rating for the instrumented function. This rating tells you to what degree the instrumented function meets its requirements to mitigate risk. After you have assigned an SIL value to each instrumented function within a safety instrumented system, the combination of these values indicates the overall safety integrity of the safety instrumented system to which the instrumented functions belong.
SIL Assessment Methods
You can use the following methods to assess the SIL value for an instrumented system:
You can use more than one assessment method to determine the SIL value for an instrumented function. The list of SIL assessments performed on the instrumented function are listed in the SIL Assessment section of the Instrumented Function workspace. However, you can associate only one SIL Assessment with the Instrumented Function.
Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Assessment Workflow
This workflow provides the basic, high-level steps for performing a Safety Integrity Level (SIL) assessment. The steps and links in this workflow do not necessarily reference every possible procedure.
Performing an SIL assessment includes the following steps:
-
Assess the required SIL value for an Instrumented Function by creating the following SIL Assessment records:
Note: You can create only one Risk Matrix and PHA SIL Assessment records for an Instrumented Function. - Associate the appropriate SIL Assessment with the Instrumented Function.
About Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Assessment Using a Risk Matrix
You can assess the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) of an instrumented function using the standard APM Risk Matrix interface to select the risk rank values for specific categories of risk.
To determine the SIL value using a Risk Matrix, you must:
- Specify the SIL Threshold values. An SIL Threshold record stores the upper and lower boundary values for each SIL.
- Select the risk assessment that you want to use to assess the SIL value. You can use the baseline Risk Matrix or a custom Risk Matrix.
- Select the unmitigated risk rank values for each category in the Risk Matrix. APM then calculates the overall unmitigated risk rank by adding the unmitigated risk rank values for each category. This value is stored in the Unmitigated Risk Rank box above the Risk Matrix on the Risk Assessment Interface.
The category that has been assigned with the highest risk rank in the Risk Matrix is called the Driving Risk, and the corresponding risk rank is called the Driving Risk Rank. Depending on the range in which the driving risk rank value falls, the system determines the SIL, and then populates the Selected SIL Level field with this value.
About Safety Integrity Level (SIL) Assessment Using a Hazards Analysis
If you have already performed risk assessments for a Hazards Analysis via the Hazards Analysis module, you can use one of those risk assessments to assess the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) for an instrumented function.
To determine SIL using a PHA Internal assessment, you must:
- Specify the SIL Threshold values. An SIL Threshold record stores the upper and lower boundary values for each SIL.
- Select the Hazards Analysis and the Cause-Consequence pair that you want to use to assess the SIL value.
The category that has been assigned with the highest risk rank in the risk assessment is called the Driving Risk, and the corresponding risk rank is called the Driving Risk Rank.
The system determines which risk rank values to use based on the following criteria:
- If the risk from the Hazards Analysis has not been mitigated, the Driving Risk Rank of the unmitigated risk assessment is used to calculate SIL.
- If the risk from the Hazards Analysis has been mitigated, then the Driving Risk Rank of the mitigated risk assessment is used to calculate SIL.
Depending on the range in which the driving risk rank value falls, APM determines the SIL, and then populates the Selected SIL Level field with this value.
About SIL Assessment Using LOPA
A Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) is a type of risk assessment that lets you determine the SIL value that is associated with the protective instruments that exist to mitigate the same risks for which the instrumented function exists. When you use a LOPA to assess the SIL value for an instrumented function, you examine the granular portions of the scenario and assess the risk associated with each portion, and then those individual risk values are used to calculate the SIL value for the instrumented function.
You can conduct one LOPA per risk that is associated with an instrumented function. Refer to the LOPA documentation for further information on managing LOPA and related record.
To assess the SIL value for an Instrumented Function using LOPA, you must link the LOPA to the LOPA Assessment of the Instrumented Function.
LOPA
When you create a LOPA record, it will be linked to the corresponding Instrumented Function record.
LOPA records can be linked to records in the following families:
- Conditional Modifier: Stores details about the consequences of the risk described in the LOPA.
- Hazards Analysis Safeguard: Stores details about the safeguards and independent layers of protection that exist to mitigate the risk associated with the consequences described in the Conditional Modifiers. Independent Layers of Protection can be linked to Equipment and Functional Locations, which store details about the equipment or location with which the independent layers of protection are associated.
These families also store numeric values that represent probability and failure rates. These values are used to calculate the SIL value of the instrumented function whose risks you are assessing through the LOPA. The calculated SIL value is stored in the Calculated SIL field in the LOPA.
When you create a LOPA, you will define the following items in the record:
- The risk for which you are conducting the LOPA.
- The consequences that may occur if that risk is not prevented from proceeding into an undesirable scenario.
- The events or conditions that can initiate the undesirable event.
- How often the event may occur.
- How often it is acceptable for the event to occur.
Independent Layers of Protection
An independent layer of protection is a device, system, or action that exists to prevent a risk, and that is independent of the event that initiates the scenario. An independent layer of protection is external to any other layer of protection or safety instrumented system. The effectiveness of an independent layer of protection is quantified in terms of its probability of failure data (PFD), which is a numeric value that represents the probability that the independent layer of protection will fail to perform its specified function.
You can use the values in the Type list to populate an Independent Layer of Protection automatically with values from an IPL Type record. IPL Type records are provided in the baseline database, and can be defined by an SIS Administrator or SIS Engineer.
You should create one Safeguard record per layer of protection that exists. Via the Safeguard datasheet, you can link the Independent Layer of Protection to the Equipment or Functional Location for which the layer of protection exists.
Conditional Modifier
A conditional modifier is an action or event that can increase or decrease the probability that a risk may occur if the action is not mitigated and proceeds into an undesirable event. Details about a conditional modifier are stored in Conditional Modifier records, which are linked to LOPA records.
For example, assume that the SIL analysis team is conducting a LOPA to investigate the risk scenario illustrated in the following diagram, where each box represents a portion of the scenario, and each label indicates the family that stores the relevant information:
When Valve A-1001 fails, flammable gas is released into an explosive atmosphere. If the flame ignites, causing a vapor cloud explosion in the vicinity of the operator, it could cause a fatal injury.
In this risk scenario, the fatal injury is a consequence of the valve failure, and the following events or actions are the conditional modifiers:
- The flame igniting
- The vapor cloud exploding
- The operator being in the vicinity of the explosion
Since these actions and events appear within the risk scenario, the probability associated with the consequence occurring is increased exponentially. In other words, if the operator was not in the vicinity of the blast, the probability of fatal injury would be less. By examining the granular events that are associated with a risk, the SIL analysis team can more accurately assess the SIL value for the instrumented function.
Assess the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) via a Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA)
This topic describes how to assess the SIL level for an Instrumented Function using a LOPA.
Before You Begin
- Create a LOPA to define the risk that you are assessing. For more information, refer to the Layers of Protection Analysis section of the documentation.
Procedure
Results
- In the Assessment Details subsection, the LOPA that you have created appears in list of SIL assessments.
- In the Assessment Details subsection, for the row that contains the LOPA that you created, the SIL level that is calculated in the LOPA appears in the SIL Level column.
- A copy of the Risk Assessment associated with the LOPA is created and linked with the LOPA Assessment.
- Any change to the linked LOPA will reflect in the associated LOPA Assessment when the state of the LOPA is changed to Complete.
What To Do Next
Assess the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) via a Risk Matrix
Before You Begin
- Create an Instrumented Function.
- Configure the Risk Matrix. For information, refer to the Risk Matrix section of the documentation.
Procedure
Results
- The Risk Matrix Internal assessment that you have created is listed in the SIL Assessment section.
What To Do Next
Assess the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) via a Process Hazards Analysis (PHA)
Before You Begin
About This Task
Procedure
Results
- The PHA - Internal record that you have created is listed in the SIL Assessment section.
What To Do Next
Assess the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) via an External Method
Before You Begin
Procedure
Results
- The External SIL Assessment that you have created is listed in the SIL Assessment section.
What To Do Next
Associate an SIL Assessment with an Instrumented Function
When you associate an SIL Assessment with an Instrumented Function, the APM system performs the SIL calculations for the Instrumented Function based on the values that you have provided in the associated SIL Assessment. You can associate only one SIL Assessment with an Instrumented Function.
Before You Begin
About This Task
This topic describes how to associate the following SIL Assessments with an Instrumented Function:
- LOPA Assessment
- Risk Matrix Internal Assessment
- PHA Internal Assessment
- External Assessment
Procedure
Results
-
Based on the values that you have entered in the SIL Assessment, APM system populates the following values in the Instrumented Function datasheet :
- Selected SIL Value
- Required Probability of Failure
- Risk Reduction Factor
- Spurious Trip Limit (per year)
- Failure Rate UOM
- Availability Target
- Last Modified
- If you associated a LOPA Assessment, Risk Matrix Internal Assessment, or a PHA Internal Assessment with the Instrumented Function, then the Risk Assessment record associated with the corresponding SIL Assessment is also linked with the Instrumented Function.