V4.3.0.0.0 Release Notes
V4.3.0.0.0
This topic provides a list of product changes included in this patch.
AMS Analytics
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, an error occurred when you attempted to view either the Alerts By Description or the Alerts By Severity graphs. This issue has been resolved. |
|
Previously, an error occurred when you attempted to view the Asset Alert Trend by Description graph for an AMS Asset. This issue has been resolved. | TFS264746 |
Previously, when a user without MI AMS Suite APM Administrator permissions, but with an active AMS Analytics license, attempted to access the AMS Asset Data Sources page, the following error message appeared: Error occurred while trying to get a list of AMS Connections. This issue has been resolved. Now, the AMS Asset Data Sources page can be accessed as expected. | TFS258541 |
Previously, when you linked an AMS Asset Alert or AMS Asset Event record to an AMS Asset record, the event or alert, respectively, did not inherit the site of the AMS Asset. In addition, when you linked an AMS Asset record to an AMS Asset Folder record, the AMS Asset record did not inherit the site of the AMS Asset Folder record. This issue has been resolved. | TFS246659 |
Previously, in the Events section of the AMS Analytics Overview page, when you tried to create an AMS Asset Recommendation based on an event, an error message appeared, indicating that the recommendation creation failed. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244363 |
APM Now
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if the Must Change Password check box for a Security User was selected and the Security User attempted to log in to GE Digital APM via the SSO Index page, the user was unable to change the password and could not log in. This issue has been resolved. | TFS287507 |
Asset Criticality Analysis (ACA)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Using the ACA Data Loader, you can now set the Asset Criticality Analysis and the ACA System to a global site reference. The following changes have been made to the ACA Data Loader template:
| TFS229223 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, the ACA Data Loader did not import Site IDs related to ACA analyses. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you have a site assigned to an ACA analysis, it will be imported correctly. | TFS306727 |
Previously, if you configured ACA to send criticality indicators to an SAP CMMS, an error occurred when the GE Digital APM system attempted to send the information. This issue has been resolved. |
|
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Promoting analyses to and from ACA. | TFS160858 |
Asset Groups
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you added an asset to an asset group, only the child assets were added and not the parent asset. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you select a parent asset, a button appears that you can select to add child assets to an asset group. | TFS317117 |
Asset Health Manager (AHM)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Reading History workspace for health indicators or their sources is now paged to improve performance when there are a large number of readings. | TFS305683 |
On the Health Indicator Trend chart, you can now enter a specific time range to adjust the amount of reading data shown on the chart. |
|
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously, the Active and Inactive instances count in the Policies section of the Health Summary page only counted the results currently loaded in the policy instances grid. This issue has been resolved. | TFS302765TFS | ||||||||||
Previously, an error and various issues occurred when you used the Activate All () or Deactivate All () buttons to activate or deactivate a large number of policy instances (i.e., more than 1,000). These issues have been resolved. |
| ||||||||||
Previously, for health indicators based on OPC Tags, a status icon did not appear for health indicators that had limits but no readings. This issue has been resolved. | TFS271106 | ||||||||||
Previously, in a health indicator's Configuration workspace, if you entered a decimal fraction without a leading zero (e.g., .25 instead of 0.25 ) in one of the upper or lower level fields, the GE Digital APM system incorrectly identified the value as text, and an error message appeared, indicating the value should be a number. This issue has been resolved. Now, you can enter a decimal fraction without a leading zero, and the value is recognized as a number. | TFS256815 | ||||||||||
Previously, if you were assigned to certain baseline Security Groups, you were unable to consolidate events. This issue has been resolved. Now, the following baseline Security Groups provide the appropriate level of permissions to consolidate events for the following families:
In addition, the MI AHI Viewer group now has View permissions for the Policy Event family. |
| ||||||||||
Previously, when you specified filter criteria in the Events section after previously closing the Health Summary tab, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS253286 | ||||||||||
Previously, if you canceled the operation when revoking a health indicator acknowledgment, then you were no longer able to revoke the acknowledgment. This issue has been resolved. | TFS253249 | ||||||||||
Previously, if a data source without an active Asset Health license existed on the GE Digital APM Application Server, errors occurred in the Asset Health Indicator Service. This issue has been resolved. Now, if a data source is not licensed, the service will skip the connection. | TFS247403 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Asset Hierarchy sorting and filtering based on health indicator status, filtering based on health indicator family field values, and filtering based on assets with or without health indicators. |
|
The display of health indicator statuses in Asset Hierarchy. | TFS86796 |
Asset Strategy Implementation (ASI)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The ASI Overview page has been redesigned to enhance the usability. The following changes have been made to the page:
To facilitate these enhancements, the following Catalog items have been added to the folder \\Public\Meridium\Modules\Asset Strategy Management\Implementation\Queries:
|
|
In the Work Management Item Definitions workspace, in the Family ID field on the datasheet, you can now select only the families related to the SAP system. | TFS305481 |
In the ASI Package workspace, in the tree, for a WMI that is already deleted, a Reset button () now appears, which you can use to undo the deletion of the WMI. | TFS302465 |
Asset Strategy Implementation now supports SAP PI. | TFS302020 |
The ASI module has been redesigned to simplify the workflow. The following changes have been made to the module workspaces:
|
|
You are now required to enter a value for the ID field of an Implementation Package record. | TFS274559 |
The Import from SAP button () has been moved from the ASM Overview page to the ASI Overview page. The functionality remains the same. | TFS274072 |
The configuration option Require a specific user to be assigned a state on all baseline states of the Implementation Package family is now cleared by default. If you want to require users to be assigned to states, you can do so via Configuration Manager. | TFS258921 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you selected a Measurement Location Group record in the ASI Package tree, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix:
| TFS305481 |
Previously, when you implemented a package, no processing indicator appeared in the implementation window to let you know that the package was in the process of being implemented. This issue has been resolved. | TFS290250 |
Previously, if you created a new ASI package and saved, and then modified the fields in the package and saved the changes, a warning message incorrectly appeared, stating that the current entity was updated by another user. This issue has been resolved. | TFS275400 |
Previously, when you loaded an active strategy and then selected the ASI button () to create a package from the strategy, the busy indicator did not appear right away, as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS264297 |
Previously, if you expanded the State Management dialog box, and then closed the active tab, the State Management dialog box remained expanded in view and incorrectly overlaid other open pages. This issue has been resolved. | TFS247514 |
Previously, when values were transferred from SAP into ASM, the value in the following fields retained the culture formatting of the SAP user:
This issue may have resulted in incorrect values appearing in these fields in GE Digital APM. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243930 |
Previously, when you cleared the Maintenance Strategy field in a maintenance plan and then saved the changes, the following issues occurred:
These issues have been resolved. | TFS239838 |
Previously, if you pasted a task list to a maintenance item that already had a task list, the copied record did not appear on the WMI tree (as expected, because there can only be one task list under a maintenance item), but a success message appeared for the paste action. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you copy a task list and then select a maintenance item that already has a task list, the paste button is disabled. | TFS236529 |
Previously, if you created a new implementation package and attempted to navigate to a different tab in the Package Details pane without saving, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Action Organizer, SAP, and Tasks tabs are disabled and you cannot navigate away from the new package tab until you have saved the record. You can, however, navigate away from the main tab at the top of the page before saving, and your data will be retained. | TFS223768 |
Previously, when you modified an existing package and then attempted to navigate away from it without saving, you were not prompted to save the package and your changes were lost. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you navigate away from the package, you are prompted to save. | TFS218756 |
Previously, pasting a copied WMI node into the package structure tree was potentially confusing due to the naming convention used for the pasted node. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you copy and paste a WMI node into the package structure tree, the pasted node has a unique name to easily identify it. | TFS216558 |
Previously, there were scenarios in which the Copy () and/or Paste () buttons were incorrectly enabled or disabled on the WMI toolbar of an implementation package. This issue has been resolved. | TFS216502 |
Previously, if you created an implementation package, and then attempted to save the package without entering a value in the ID field, you were logged out of the application. This issue has been resolved. You must now enter a value in the ID field before you can save the package. | TFS206640 |
Previously, if you created an implementation package from a strategy, and then packaged an action by building an operation, the action’s Long Description field did not match the operation’s Long Text field as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS205814 |
Previously, if you deleted a strategy from the ASI Overview page, the package count on the ASI Overview page did not update automatically to account for the deletion, and you had to refresh the page for the count to be updated. This issue has been resolved. | TFS196793 |
Previously, when you imported multiple assets at the same time that had different primary packages, the packages were not updated correctly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS160426 |
When importing data from SAP into ASM, you can now search by both equipment and functional location, instead of just one or the other. | TFS62476 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now manage all maintenance packages for any operation under a particular task list. | TFS117767 |
You can now search for the SAP Task List that you want to use to create a new Task List record. | TFS232661 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
To enhance usability, the following tabs have been removed from the ASI Overview page:
| TFS309330 |
The SAP System Definitions workspace has been removed from the Asset Strategy Implementation Admin page. You can now manage a SAP system definition via the datasheet for the EAM System record. | TFS294443 |
The management of tasks has been moved to Implement Actions workspace in ASM. Therefore, the SAP and Tasks tabs have been removed from the ASI Package workspace. | TFS288567 |
The concept of a primary and secondary package has been removed. Rather than sending an entire strategy to a package, you can now send individual actions. | TFS280619 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Creating implementation roles and filtering the WMI tree by each role. | TFS243573 |
Using a link to manage the object list records that are linked to maintenance item records represented by the selected node. | TFS238443 |
The option to exclude child items when copying Work Management Items. | TFS147790 |
Managing asset and action assignments when executing copy/paste operations. | TFS144110 |
Searching in SAP for the standard text value that you want to append to the value in the Long Text field of a Maintenance Item record. | TFS117765 |
Asset Strategy Management (ASM)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The ASM Overview page has been redesigned to enhance usability. The following changes have been made to the page:
To facilitate these changes, the following Catalog items have been added:
|
|
The WMI Definition family will now be used only for SAP. | TFS305035 |
To simplify the workflow, actions can now be implemented by health indicators rather than HI Sources. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, if an action was previously implemented as an HI Source, if that HI Source has a related health indicator, the action will be linked to that health indicator during the upgrade. If an HI Source does not have a related health indicator, the action will no longer be implemented after the upgrade. | TFS288519 |
You can now create General Recommendations directly from the Recommendations pane in ASM, and the recommendations are linked to the assets in strategy automatically. | TFS285620 |
You are now required to enter a value for the Name field of Action and Risk records. | TFS274521 |
When accessing an asset strategy, you can now access the details of an asset by selecting the hyperlink in the upper-left corner of the workspace. | TFS273258 |
The Implement Actions workspace has been redesigned to simplify the workflow and improve usability. The following changes have been made to the workspace:
|
|
You can now maximize charts on the Risk Analysis and Risk Summary pages for asset strategies to analyze them in a full-screen view. | TFS251973 |
The workflow for applying a template to an asset strategy has been simplified so that you now apply templates to assets instead of asset strategies. If you apply a template to an asset that has no associated strategy, a strategy will be created for the asset. | TFS249477 |
A new chart, Cost Projection, now appears in the Risk Analysis section. This chart displays the data shown in the Annual Action Cost and Action Cost Projection charts. | TFS245891 |
After using the ASM Strategy and ASM Template Data Loaders, you can now view the information on the number of processed, rejected, updated, and created records. | TFS244076 |
Now, an asset strategy cannot exist without a linked asset. Therefore, when you create an asset strategy, you are now required to link an asset before you can save the new strategy. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, any strategies in your database that are not linked to assets will be converted to templates. Note: If you use the Asset Strategy Management Data Loader to load asset strategies, you must load them with assets.
| TFS225761 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you applied updates to an action that was already linked to a Calibration Task, Task ID field of the Calibration Task datasheet was updated based on the value in the Action Name field. This issue has been resolved. | TFS304056 |
Previously, selections made in some of the grids in the Apply Template Builder were not retained. This issue has been resolved. Now, there is no option to apply a partial template; you can only apply entire templates. If you want to apply part of a template, you can do so using one of the following methods:
| TFS290238 |
You can now navigate away from an asset strategy, system strategy, unit strategy, or asset strategy template tab without saving any changes, and the data will be retained. If you attempt to close any of those tabs without saving, the Unsaved Changes confirmation dialog will appear, prompting you to save. | TFS278872 |
Previously, for a risk that was based on an ASO simulation, the Risk Rank field was disabled so that you could not provide a value. This issue has been resolved. | TFS278401 |
The Criticality, Duty, and Service fields now appear on the Asset Strategy Template datasheet. | TFS278397 |
Previously, if you changed a value on the Protection Level Slider bar on a risk or action, and made no other change, you could not save the change because the Save button () was disabled. This issue has been resolved. | TFS277976 |
Previously, you were incorrectly allowed to add a new strategy without an asset to a system strategy in ASO. This issue has been resolved. Now, you can only import existing strategies that have assets. | TFS277932 |
Previously, on iOS devices, when the Resource Finder window appeared after selecting the Import icon () in the Resources section, the Import and Cancel buttons were not visible and you could not close the window. This issue has been resolved. | TFS271505 |
Previously, when the value in the Risk Rank field was less than 0.01, no data was displayed on the Risk Profile chart in the Strategy Overview section and the Risk Summary chart in the Risk Analysis workspace. This issue has been resolved. | TFS269036 |
Previously, in the Risk Analysis workspace for a unit or system strategy with no assessed financial risk, an unmitigated risk icon appeared on the Financial Risk chart with a value of 0. This issue has been resolved. Now, if no risk has been assessed then no icon will appear on the chart. | TFS262874 |
Previously, if you created a new strategy and then moved to another tab without saving the strategy, the focus on the tabs on the left pane shifted. This issue has been resolved. | TFS258157 |
Previously, if you expanded the State Management dialog box, and then closed the active tab, the State Management dialog box remained expanded in view and incorrectly overlaid other open pages. This issue has been resolved. | TFS247514 |
Previously, on a Risk or Action datasheet the options to print, turn on the help text, and access reference documents did not appear as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS239603 |
Previously, when a strategy template had a custom required field, the template could not be applied as a master template. This issue has been resolved. | TFS238467 |
Previously, when you attempted to apply a master template to a strategy, incorrect options appeared for actions and risks that you could apply. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you apply a template as a master, all the actions and risks are applied to the strategy. | TFS237708 |
Previously, you could incorrectly implement an action with an item that was already implementing another action. This issue has been resolved. Now, only records that are not already implementing an action can be selected when you search for HI sources. | TFS218394 |
Previously, if you deleted a strategy from the ASM Overview page, the strategy count by state on the ASM Overview page did not update to account for the deletion, and you had to refresh the page for the count to be updated. This issue has been resolved. | TFS196793 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The WMI Definition family is now used only for defining items within the ASI Admin feature. Therefore, in the Work Management Item Definitions workspace, the Group Name field has been removed from the datasheet. | TFS305035 |
You can no longer copy an asset node in ASO. | TFS277932 |
To simplify the ASM workflow, the Activation Date and Activated By fields for the Asset Strategy and Asset Strategy Template families have been deprecated. These fields are no longer needed because the State Management feature provides the full activation history for a strategy. (TS ID: 268138) | |
To simplify the ASM workflow, the Strategy Owner and Template Owner fields for the Asset Strategy, System Strategy, Unit Strategy, Strategy Template, and Strategy Revision families have been deprecated. These fields previously existed to prevent deletion of the strategy or template by anyone except the owner. Now, you do not have to be a Strategy/Template Owner to delete a strategy or template. | TFS255110 |
The MI ASM Analyst, MI RCM User, and MI ASI User security roles have been removed as they are no longer needed. These roles were previously used for state management and have now been replaced by the baseline security roles delivered for each module. Note:
The MI ASM Analyst, MI RCM User, and MI ASI User security groups are unchanged. | TFS254632 |
The ability to collapse the Risk and Cost Summary charts in a system strategy’s Risk Analysis workspace has been removed. | TFS242221 |
Now, an asset strategy cannot exist without a linked asset. Any strategies without assets saved in your system will be converted to templates after upgrading. | TFS225761 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Migrating strategies between databases. |
Asset Strategy Optimization (ASO)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, you could add and delete risks in Active state and assign new or existing action to mitigate the active risks. This issue has been resolved. Now, you cannot add, delete, or mitigate risks in Active state. | TFS244226 |
Previously, in the Grid View for an ASO analysis, if you selected the Edit button () in a row, and then selected the Cancel button (), an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243047 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Optimizing Actions. | TFS65780 |
Calibration Management
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now transfer calibration data between GE Digital APM and the GE Druck documenting process calibrators. The following GE Druck calibrator devices are supported:
|
|
Calibration Management now supports automated calibration using CMX Calibration Management Software. | TFS247857 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
On the Calibration Admin Preferences page, you can now perform the following tasks:
|
|
Device mappings feature is now available. The following changes have been made to support this feature
|
|
To support Beamex CMX Calibration software units of measure, a new system code table, CALIBRATION_CMX_UOM_LIST has been added. | TFS303533 |
To support GE Druck documenting process calibrators, the following changes have been made:
|
|
To support Beamex CMX Calibration software units of measure, the CALIBRATION_CMX_UOM_LIST system code table has been added. | TFS303533 |
To support automated calibration using Beamex CMX Calibration software, the following changes have been made:
|
|
A new Security Group, MI Calibration Viewer, has been added. This group has View permissions for all the Entity and Relationship families used in Calibration Management module. | TFS190113 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you set a set a due date range in the Due Date Range filter in the Calibration Queue section and moved to a new page, and then returned to the Calibration Queue section, the due date range was reset to the default value. This issue has been resolved. | TFS315930 |
Previously, if you tried to link multiple assets, including linked and unlinked assets, to a calibration profile, you had to refresh the page in order to see an updated list of which assets had already been linked. This issue has been resolved. Now, a validation message appears to indicate the assets that have been linked. | TFS311593 |
Previously, when you performed calibration using a Functional Test Calibration Template that did not contain Calibration Template Detail records, the Calibration Strategy field in the Calibration Event datasheet was not populated and the Calibration Result records were not created. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you save a Functional Test Calibration Template without creating the Calibration Template Details records, an error message appears, asking you to enter detail records. The Calibration Strategy field on the Functional Test Calibration Template datasheet is populated based on the number of Calibration Template Detail records that you create. | TFS263852 |
Previously, in a Standard Gas Component record, when you modified the values in the Requested and the Analytical Result fields, and then saved the record, an error appeared, stating that the Standard Analytical Result is not within the tolerance range. Instead of the modified value, the value that existed in the Requested field before modification was considered for calculation of tolerance range. This issue has been resolved. | TFS251137 |
Previously, in the Calibration tab of a calibration event, the calibration results were not displayed in the correct sequence. This issue has been resolved. | TFS248138 |
Previously, when you selected the Calibration Events or Calibration Profiles tab for the first time, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS247746 |
Previously, when you printed an analog report, the printed copy showed duplicate details of the report data. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244965 |
Previously, when you did not have license or family privileges to Calibration Management, you were redirected to the Access Denied page without an error message. Now, in this scenario an error message appears with the details of the error. | TFS244583 |
Previously, when you switched from the Calibration Management Overview page to the Manage Calibration Tasks page, the Enter Parameter Values window appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243980 |
Previously, when you performed a search of the created calibration templates, the search results did not display all the calibration templates that were created. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243402 |
Previously, when you switched tabs within the Calibration Management Overview page, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243388 |
Previously, a warning message did not appear when a calibration record was closed before saving. This issue has been resolved. | TFS242531 |
Previously, in the Calibration section of a Calibration Event, you could add or delete the Calibration Result records. This issue is resolved. | TFS241897 |
Previously, when you deleted a calibration template, an error message appeared if the calibration template referenced an associated calibration. This issue has been resolved. | TFS230393 |
Previously, in the calibration templates, the column heading and the values were not aligned properly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS203107 |
Previously, in the Calibration Data Loader, an incorrect error message appeared in the log when you did not provide values in some of the required fields. This issue has been resolved. | TFS185008 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The device mappings feature is now available. | TFS294774 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Automated Calibration using Beamex and Meriam documenting process calibrators. Note: Automated calibration using Beamex documenting process calibrators, Beamex MC5 and Beamex MC6, is supported using Beamex Business Bridge (B3) Version 1 (1.2.0) software for Beamex CMX Calibration software. |
|
Cognitive Analytics
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now delete or copy cognitions from the Cognitive Analytics Overview page. | TFS266012 |
You can now create a script from the Classifiers section of the Cognitive Analytics Overview page. | TFS264185 |
If the query specified for a cognition is modified, the related information in the Details workspace is now automatically refreshed upon navigating between tabs. For example, if you modify a query and then return to the Details workspace, you do not need to refresh the browser to see the updated information. | TFS259375 |
On the Details workspace of a cognition, the value in the Bulk Input Data box now appears as a hyperlink. You can select the hyperlink to open the corresponding query in a new tab. | TFS258444 |
The Cognitive Analytics Overview page now contains the following graphs:
| TFS228422 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when an executed cognition timed out, the value in the Status field in the History workspace remained as Running, and you could not see the actual status. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244614 |
Previously, when you navigated between the properties windows of Logic nodes in the design canvas of a cognition, at times, an error message appeared stating that there was an error loading the page. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243686 |
Configuration Manager
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if you used a non-English culture setting, the culture-appropriate date and time formatting was not applied to every applicable field throughout GE Digital APM. This issue has been resolved. | TFS310837 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can no longer create field behaviors for Relationship families. | TFS300108 |
In the Units of Measure and Conversions feature, the unit MM/YEAR in the Units of Measure section has been marked as deprecated. | TFS68918 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Global number and date format. | TFS160148 |
Global Preferences- Background Colors. | TFS65297 |
Connections - PDI Systems
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Connections to GE Historian 7.0 SP1 are now supported for Process Data Integration. | TFS270005 |
Connections to GE Cimplicity V9.5 are now supported for Process Data Integration. | TFS279832 |
Data Loaders
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
When you test the connections on the Data Loaders page, the communication channels between the APM Connect server and the Integration Web Services is no longer checked. This is because the Integration Web Services are no longer used by Data Loaders, and including it in the test could lead to misleading results. | TFS312248 |
Datasheets
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The UoM Conversion Tool has been introduced in V4.3.0.0.0. You can use this feature to view numeric datasheet values in different units of measure (UOM). | TFS247786 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Rather than a module-specific pane, Associated Pages can now be accessed via an Associated Pages button () on the datasheet. The functionality remains the same. | TFS277323 |
You can now delete an existing value in a drop-down list, and then select a new value, including a null value, in the drop-down list. | TFS271379 |
You can now add fields from Available Items pane to a datasheet without adding a datasheet section. | TFS264322 |
On all the datasheets, the controls on the toolbar such as Datasheet selection, Save, or Print remain visible when you scroll to the bottom of datasheet. | TFS151071 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if you added a hyperlink field to a datasheet (e.g., the Equipment datasheet) and populated it with a hyperlink, and then searched for that type of record, HTML markup appeared in your search results. This issue has been resolved. | TFS307380 |
Previously, if the Active Status check boxes was cleared for a family, the family still appeared as an option in the Look In and Linked to boxes when you performed a search, although records in those families would not appear in search results. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the Active Status check box is cleared, the family is completely excluded when performing a search. | TFS297410 |
Previously, if a datasheet contained an dropdown list box that contained an unrestricted number of values, when you entered text in the box, the values displayed in the dropdown list box would not be filtered accordingly. This issue has been resolved. Now, as you enter the text in the dropdown list box, the values will be filtered and displayed in the box accordingly. | TFS280276 |
Previously, if the field caption for a column on a datasheet or offline form was too long to be displayed in the column, the text wrapped to a second line. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the word is too long to be displayed in the column, the field caption will be truncated and appended with an ellipses. | TFS271317 |
Previously, if the datasheet contained only one datasheet section, you could delete the section but the fields in that section did not get deleted. This issue has been resolved. Now, if the datasheet contains only one section, you cannot delete that section. | TFS264322 |
Previously, on any datasheet, when you turned on the help text, the help text for large text box fields, such as the Required Date field, were not displayed correctly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS251109 |
Previously, on any datasheet, if a site designated in the Site control had a long name, the State Configuration section on the top navigation bar was not displayed correctly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS249672 |
eLog
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The eLog module has been introduced in V4.3.0.0.0. You can use this module to document scheduled and unscheduled events that occur during the course of asset operation, to report findings related to shift periods, and to document when shifts begin and end. | TFS249678 |
Family Management
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
In the Behavior section of the Fields in Family Management, a new option APM Query has been added to the Valid Value field. You can now populate values in a field by using the query. | TFS275129 |
You can now create relationship between two families by using a foreign key. To support this enhancement, a new check box, Foreign Key Relationship, has been added to the Manage Relationship Definition window of Relationship Definition section. | TFS253897 |
The Information and the Behavior sections of Fields in Family Management have been enhanced to make them more intuitive. | TFS243722 |
A new column Spread From Parent has been added to the Fields section of Family Management. This column indicates whether a field has been spread from the parent family or not. | TFS232859 |
Family Policies
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
A new node, the Baseline Rule node, has been added to family policies. You can use this node to run the existing GE Digital APM baseline family-level rule that corresponds to the policy’s family and trigger. This allows you to use both family policies and baseline rules for a single family. | TFS246665 |
The following nodes now include the system field outputs Entity ID and Site Key:
| TFS209122 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when viewing policy execution history, if you selected the Actions or Errors check box, an error occurred if no policy executions matched the selected criteria. This issue has been resolved. | TFS296123 |
Family Policies and Policy Designer
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
If the input specified for a Sum node is an empty collection, the resulting answer from the Sum node is automatically zero (0), which may considerably simplify the policy design. Previously, in this scenario, depending on the policy design, the policy issued a warning and the execution of the policy may have stopped. | TFS307333 |
In a Create Entity node’s Properties window, you can now specify the Site Reference Key of the site to which the new record should be assigned. | TFS300141 |
New logs for sync service and policy execution service are now written to C:\ProgramData\Meridium\Logs. | TFS298076 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if you created a policy with a Text node containing the standalone characters “{“ or “}�? that were not intended to be part of a placeholder value, then the characters were not parsed correctly and an error occurred. This issue has been resolved in most scenarios. Note: Refer to KBA #5444 for more information | TFS308194 |
Previously, when a Boolean value was selected in a Comparison node, the value NaN was displayed on the node in the model canvas instead of yes or no, as expected. This issue has been resolved. Note: This issue was display-only and the calculations still functioned as expected. | TFS296201 |
Previously, an error and various issues occurred when you used the Activate All () or Deactivate All () buttons to activate or deactivate a large number of policy instances (i.e., more than 1,000). These issues have been resolved. |
|
Previously, for policies containing R Script nodes, when you validated a policy instance, validation ran successfully, but collection inputs to an R Script node were not displayed in the Validation pane. In addition, you could not copy the collection input values to use in Ad Hoc validation. These issues have been resolved. | TFS271491 |
Previously, users assigned to a custom role were not able to access the policies in Policy Designer. This issue has been resolved. Now, the users assigned to any role that includes privileges for MI Policy Designer group will be able to access the policies in Policy Designer. | TFS235992 |
Previously, if an invalid data source existed on the GE Digital APM Application Server, the Policy Trigger Service and Policy Execution Service shut down and could not be restarted. This issue has been resolved. | TFS197508 |
Foundation
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
If you try to log in to GE Digital APM with an expired license, if you are a Super User, a prompt will now appear that will allow you to enter a new license key and reactivate. | TFS293555 |
A new button, Theme Settings, () has been added to the top navigation bar. You can use this button to display the contents of a grid in a compact view mode. | TFS239532 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Bulk Data Form Previously, records with an invalid date value were saved with a blank value in the date field. This issue has been resolved. Now, if an invalid date is used, the record is not saved, and an error message appears. You can either select a valid value from the calendar to correct the value, or delete the invalid value and replace it with a valid one. | TFS320631 |
General Dashboards
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now modify your personal dashboard from your home page. | TFS211278 |
Generation Availability Analysis (GAA)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
GAA now supports reporting to Canadian Electricity Association (CEA) in addition to NERC. | TFS248096 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
You can now create a log entry for a Primary Event and track the associated log entry for the event. You can use this log entry to document observations on events related to power generation during a shift. | TFS297158 | ||||||||||||||||
To improve usability, the GAA Administrator page has been redesigned with the following changes:
|
| ||||||||||||||||
To support multiple weightage types, the Performance family has been split into the following three families:
|
| ||||||||||||||||
To generate Regulatory reports, the following Catalog items have been added to the folder Public\Meridium\Modules\Generation Management\Queries\NERC Queries:
| TFS275273 | ||||||||||||||||
Management reports are now generated based on values in the fields in the GAA Performance Summary and GAA Performance Fuel families, instead of the GAA Performance family. To facilitate this enhancement, the Performance 05 query in the folder Public\Meridium\Modules\Generation Management\Queries\Report Queries has been updated to use the GAA Performance Summary and GAA Performance Fuel families. | TFS275566 | ||||||||||||||||
The Cause Codes for 2016 are now included in the Cause Codes family, which populates the Cause Code field in a Cause Codes record. | TFS272953 | ||||||||||||||||
To support importing existing data to GAA, a relationship has been created between the MI Has Reference Documents relationship family and the GAA Unit family. |
| ||||||||||||||||
To support the mappings between NERC and CEA, the GAA Code Mapping family has been added. |
| ||||||||||||||||
You can now create multiple Primary Events simultaneously using the Bulk Data Form. | TFS256923 | ||||||||||||||||
To support reporting to CEA, the following new families have been added:
|
| ||||||||||||||||
To support the Revision History of a Primary Event, the Primary Event History family has been added. | TFS253903 | ||||||||||||||||
The Amplification Codes for 2016 are now included in the Amplification Codes family, which populates the Amplification Code field in an Amplification Codes record. | TFS248101 | ||||||||||||||||
To support reporting to CEA, the following changes have been made to various datasheets in Generation Availability Analysis:
|
| ||||||||||||||||
In the Unit Summary workspace, you can now view the losses for each event in the GAA Unit for a specified period. | TFS208013 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, in Generation Availability Analysis, if you did not use a specific identifier for the asset group name, you could create duplicate groups in the Asset Hierarchy. This issue has been resolved. | TFS284492 |
Previously, in GAA Unit Capacity records, when you changed the Gross Maximum Capacity or the Net Maximum Capacity of an existing Unit to a value lower than the Gross Dependable Capacity or the Net Dependable Capacity, respectively, you were able to save the record. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you save the record, an error message appears, indicating that the dependable capacity cannot be greater than the maximum capacity, and the record is not saved. | TFS249542 |
Previously, in the Unit Summary workspace, in the Generation Metrics section, the performance data for a GAA Unit during a selected period, did not appear in the chronological order of the reporting month and year. This issue has been resolved. | TFS247935 |
Previously, if you modified the Start Date, End Date, or the Event Type for a Primary Event after creating an associated Contributing Event, the Start Date, End Date, or the Event Type for the Contributing Event was not updated. This issue has been resolved. | TFS240761 |
Previously, when you created a Primary Event, if you entered a value of more than 30 characters in the Verbal Description field, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. Now, you can enter a maximum of 255 characters in the Verbal Description field. | TFS239643 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now migrate from the Generation Management module in V3.6.0.0.0 to the Generation Availability Analysis (GAA) module in V4.3.0.0.0. |
|
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To generate Regulatory reports for a GAA Unit, the following queries have been replaced with new queries:
| TFS275273 | ||||||
The following fields were not used and have been removed from the Events datasheet in GAA:
| TFS242084 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following fields and related functionality from the GAA Plant and GAA Unit record:
| TFS229627 | ||||||||||||
The following fields and related functionality from the Performance record:
|
| ||||||||||||
The following families in GAA:
|
| ||||||||||||
The following Security Groups in GAA:
|
|
GE Analytics
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, the DAQ ID field in the GE Tag Event family was a numeric field, which may have caused errors while transferring data from your GE system to your GE Digital APMsystem. This issue has been resolved. To facilitate this fix, the numeric DAQ ID field has been deprecated, and a new DAQ ID field with a character data type has been added. When you upgrade, values from the old field are populated in the new field automatically. | TFS288991 |
Previously, when you linked a GE Tag Event record to a GE Tag record, the GE Tag Event record did not inherit the site of the GE Tag record. This issue has been resolved. | TFS246659 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
KPIs for GE Analytics. | TFS162791 |
GE Digital APM Mobile Application
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you opened or returned to the GE Digital APM mobile application while in offline mode, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS281204 |
Graphs
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when using the GE Digital APM mobile application on a Microsoft Surface Pro device, when you selected a graph, the hyperlinked information on the graph did not appear as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS294707 |
Previously, when using stacked area line graphs, the graph labels were labeled null if you did not have any valid data points. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you do not have valid data points, the graph labels are blank. | TFS290091 |
Previously, if you did not save a graph that you had modified before leaving the page, a notification asking you to save your work did not appear, and your work was not saved. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you do not save your work, a notification will appear. | TFS246671 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Exporting to a PDF and printing graphs. | TFS81015 |
Hazards Analysis
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
In the Hazards Analysis data loader, a new worksheet, MI_IPL_CHEC, has been added. This worksheet is used to import IPL Checklist records that store your selection for the criteria that are used to determine if a Safeguard is an IPL. | TFS284633 |
When you copy a System/Node in a Hazards Analysis, the associated Deviations or What Ifs, Causes, Consequences, Safeguards, and Risk Assessments are also copied and associated with the copy of the System/Node. | TFS277084 |
You can now create or modify the criteria that are used to assess if the Safeguard is an Independent Protection Layer (IPL). To facilitate this enhancement, a new family, IPL Checklist, has been added. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, for each Safeguard that previously existed in you database, IPL Checklist records are created to store your selection for the criteria to assess if the Safeguard is an IPL. |
|
You can now create or link a Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) to a Consequence for which you want to assess the required Safety Integrity Level (SIL). | TFS249978 |
A new Security Group, MI Hazards Viewer, has been added. This group has View permissions for all the Entity and Relationship families used in Hazards Analysis module. | TFS190113 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, in Hazards Analysis, you could not create a mitigated risk assessment for recommendations that did not have an associated mitigated risk. As a result, when you promoted such recommendations, the mitigated risk did not appear in the promoted strategy. This issue has been resolved. | TFS301503 |
Previously, in the Team Members section of a Hazards Analysis, when you added a team member, two team members were added to the team although you selected only one team member. This issue has been resolved. | TFS262037 |
Previously, when you closed a HAZOP or What-If analysis without saving the record, a warning message did not appear. This issue has been resolved. Now, a warning message appears, indicating that you have unsaved changes. | TFS247728 |
Previously, when you switched from the Linked Assets section of a System/Node to another tab or page, and then returned to the Linked Assets section, the Add button () and the Delete button () that previously appeared in the section, did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS245357 |
Previously, if you did not have license for the module or security permission for a family, you were redirected to the Access Denied page without an error message. This issue has been resolved. Now, an error message appears. | TFS244583 |
Previously, when you accessed the Recommendations pane by selecting the Safeguard instead of the Consequence in a Hazards Analysis, the Add button () was enabled and you could create a recommendation. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Add button () appears only when you access the Recommendations pane by selecting a Consequence. | TFS244206 |
Previously, in a HAZOP analysis, when you created a new recommendation, promoted it to ASM, and then selected the link for the promoted strategy in the Recommendationspane, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243236 |
Previously, when you created a recommendation and saved the data, in the Alert tab, two loading indicators appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS241867 |
Previously, when you promoted recommendations in a Hazards Analysis that was in the Active state, the recommendations did not get promoted to ASM. This issue had been resolved. | TFS237132 |
Previously, using the Hazards Analysis data loader, when you imported HAZOP Analysis data in which the System/Nodes and the assets did not contain the HAZOP ID, the data was imported successfully. This issue has been resolved. Now, the data is not imported and an error is recorded in the error log for the data import job. | TFS195257 |
Previously, when using the Hazards Analysis data loader, when you imported HAZOP Analysis data that contained the mitigated risk assessments but did not contain the unmitigated risk assessments, data was imported successfully. This issue has been resolved. Now, the data is not imported and an error is recorded in the error log for the data import job. | TFS193516 |
Previously, in the Oracle databases, in the Analysis Summary graph for a Hazard Analysis, the nodes did not appear in the order in which they were created. This issue has been resolved. | TFS156753 |
Import and Export
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The following new metadata types have been added to the Import and Export feature of the Configuration Manager:
|
|
A new metadata type, All Metadata, has been added to the Import feature of Configuration Manager. This metadata type allows you to import all the items in an import file without manually selecting each items in that file. | TFS235058 |
You can now import or export the KPIs in a dashboard along with the other dashboard widgets. | TFS250318 |
Inspection Field Data Collection
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Inspection Recommendations offline form has been added to Inspection Field Data Collection. You can now add, modify, and delete Inspection Recommendations while offline. Note: If you have customized any of the online behaviors for Full Inspection, General Inspection, Checklist Inspection or Recommendation families in previous versions of GE Digital APM, then your customizations will be overwritten with the offline baseline behaviors. |
|
You can now view, generate, configure, and download PDF versions of Inspection Reports and Inspection History Reports to use offline. |
|
You can now add Reference Document images to inspections that are completed while offline. | TFS248966 |
Inspection Management
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Item ID field has been added to the Inspection Task Layout datasheet. When defining Inspection scope, this field aids in profile selection. | TFS302732 |
The Protected Equipment Type field is now included in the NR13 Technical Data query so that you can use PRD functionality with the NR13 module. | TFS302633 |
The following enhancements have been made to the NR13 module:
| TFS294506 |
You can now schedule emails to be sent by the GE Digital APM system to alert assigned users when Inspection recommendations are due and when Inspection Recommendations need to be reevaluated. | TFS254108 |
You can now generate Inspection Reports from the Manage Task page of the Inspection Task workspace. | TFS210514 |
You can now generate Inspection Recommendations from General Findings records. | TFS210502 |
The following updates have been made to the Inspection Management Data Loaders:
| TFS207023 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you created a Checklist Inspection, if you set the value in the Completion Date field to a date in the future, the value in the Commencement Date field was populated with the same date as Completion Date. This issue has been resolved. | TFS308336 |
Previously, when creating a new Inspection Task, if you cleared the Recurring box on the Inspection Task datasheet, the value in the Next Date field was shifted forward by one day. This issue has been resolved. | TFS288613 |
Previously, on the Manage Task page, if you cleared the Recurring check box, the value in the Next Date field was populated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS272020 |
Previously, on some Inspection Management datasheets, if you scrolled down the page, the Save button () was not always visible. This issue has been resolved. Now the Save button () remains stationary on all Inspection Management datasheets. | TFS254635 |
Previously, when you accessed a localized version of the Inspection Management module, the following occurred:
These issues have been resolved. |
|
Previously, the entries in the error log for the Inspection Management Data Loader e were not localized. This issue has been resolved. | TFS180047 |
Previously, when you searched for an existing Inspection, the Inspection Management Overview page did not open, and you were directed to an invalid URL. This issue has been resolved. | TFS176122 |
Previously, on the IM Admin Preferences page, Time-Based Inspection (TBI) Settings could not be updated by members of the MI Inspection Security Group with the Inspection Administrator Human Resource Role. This issue has been resolved. Now, members of the MI Inspection Security Group have the following privileges when updating TBI Settings:
| TFS163886 |
Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Layers of Protection Analysis module has been introduced in V4.3.0.0.0. You can use this module to identify the required Safety Integrity Level (SIL) for SIL Assessment of an Instrumented Function defined in the SIS Management module and to determine the level of safeguarding required for a hazardous scenario defined in the Hazards Analysis module. | TFS249995 |
Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCC)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The LCC Overview page now contains a new tab, My Analyses, which lists the analyses for which you are assigned as a team member. | TFS294940 |
A new query, Cost Data Query, has been added to the Catalog folder \\Public\Meridium\Modules\LCC\Queries. This query creates individual queries for each analysis in a database that you can use to export LCC data as Excel spreadsheets or datasets. The exported data can then be used in charts, graphs, and reports. | TFS290537 |
The MI LCC Administrator Security Group has been added. Members of the MI LCC Administrator Security Group have full access of LCC for any site-accessible analysis and can change state assignments. | TFS290515 |
The ability to manage State Assignments in Life Cycle Cost Analysis is now available. When you create a new Life Cycle Cost Analysis, it is in the In Progress state. When the analysis is complete, users with appropriate team member roles can then change the state to Complete, and the analysis will become view-only. To facilitate this enhancement, the following two team member roles have been created in LCC:
Super Users and members of the MI LCC Administrator security group can modify the state of any analysis without being members of the analysis. | TFS271565 |
You can now find and select scenarios from multiple Life Cycle Costs Analyses to be copied into a new Analysis. Copied Operating Costs and Capital Costs from the selected scenarios also appear in the Details subsection of the Scenario Definition section. |
|
The Annual Escalation Rate is now applied to all Known Interval costs and Imported Strategy Action costs for the Operating Profile. (TS ID: ) | TFS252010 |
Annual Escalation Rate is now applied to Revenue over the span of the LCC analyses. Previously, no escalation was applied to Revenue. | TFS251972 |
To streamline adding Secondary Elements in the Cost Data section for a Scenario, you can now copy Secondary Elements. | TFS187597 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if you were an LCC User without permissions to delete LCC Analyses, but did have permissions to delete analysis components, then the Delete icons () were not active for analyses and all of their components. This issue has been resolved. | TFS285607 |
Previously, if you selected the Repeat Annually check box, but specified a total Operating Profile lasting longer than a year, then the profile would repeat the length of time entered, rather than repeating yearly. This issue has been resolved. You can no longer add a profile lasting longer than 1 year when the Repeat Annually check box is selected. | TFS284397 |
Previously, the MI Strategy Role contained the wrong LCC Security Group and did not allow the MI Strategy Role Security Group to create, modify, or delete LCC Analyses. This issue has been resolved. | TFS245169 |
Previously, fields in the LCC Analysis and LCC Scenario families did not have a character length limit and allowed values longer than 255 characters for numeric and non-numeric entries. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243789 |
Previously, you could not view the name of the primary or secondary element if you were not assigned to the site of the asset associated with the primary or secondary element. This issue has been resolved. | TFS241876 |
Management of Change (MOC)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Management of Change module has been introduced in V4.3.0.0.0. You can use this module to effectively manage implementation of changes in your organization. Using MOC, you can manage changes using Change Projects in which changes are formally introduced, approved, and implemented as tasks. Additionally, you can relate records from other GE Digital APM entities to ensure that all impacted areas of the organization are recorded as changed elements in a Change Project. This provides your organization with a greater degree of auditability, which is essential in industries that require Management of Change as a regulatory compliance requirement. | TFS280063 |
Metrics and Scorecards
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Two new buttons, () and (), have been added to the Scorecard Details page. Using these buttons, you can bulk update the measures of all the KPIs in a Scorecard and view the log of the bulk update. |
|
A new Security Group, MI Metric Viewer, has been added. Members of this group have only View permission for the Metric Views, Key Performance Indicators, and Scorecards records. | TFS264852 |
You can now use a bullet chart to view a KPI. A new button () has been added to the KPI Details page that enables you to view a KPI as a Dial Chart or a Bullet Chart. | TFS257661 |
You can now set the best value and worst value for a Key Performance Indicator using GE Digital APM queries. | TFS250852 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Export/Import of KPI Schedules. | TFS173886 |
Selecting columns to include in a Scorecard. | TFS70641 |
GM (Generation Management) cube is deferred from V4.0.0.0. Any previously deployed GM (Generation Management) cube, which worked in V3.6 and earlier releases, will continue to work in V4.0.0.0 after upgrading the product. You will be able to use the existing GM cube and the support will continue. | TFS160446 |
Mobile Proof Testing
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
This module has been renamed from Proof Test Data Collection to Mobile Proof Testing. Throughout the V4.3.0.0.0 documentation, including these Release Notes, we refer to this module by its new name. | TFS271310 |
You can now create Recommendations for Proof Tests when you are offline. You can also take photos of the affected assets and associate them to the Recommendations. When the Proof Tests are synchronized, the images attached to the Recommendations appear as Reference Documents in the Recommendations created for the Instrumented Function. |
|
Policy Designer
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Policy Designer license is required to take full advantage of Policy Designer functionality. However, you can now view the module workflow policies for the following modules even if the Policy Designer license is inactive:
| TFS313025 |
You can now use the Constant node to configure a Data Frame as an input to a policy. | TFS226237 |
The following nodes now include the system field outputs Entity ID and Site Key:
| TFS209122 |
Production Loss Analysis (PLA)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now reconcile Production Losses when the Actual Production meets or exceeds the Short Range Plan or MSCR. As a result of this enhancement, you can also add losses when the unreconciled losses count is zero. | TFS309114 |
The Product Alias field has been added to the Production Profile family, and to the ProductionProfile datasheet in the Production Loss Analysis Data Loader. This modifiable field appears in the PLA Application Settings and is used to automatically populate the Product Name fields in Production Plans and Production Plan Templates. |
|
When you create a new Production Event Code at the parent and child levels, the new code is now added to the list in alphabetical order. | TFS302193 |
The queries whose results are displayed in the lists on the PLA Overview page can now be modified to add, delete, hide, or rearrange columns. | TFS247785 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you uploaded a manual Production Plan using the Production Loss Analysis Data Loader, the quantity appeared as 0 instead of the sum of planned values. This issue has been resolved. | TFS322213 |
Previously, when a short range Production Plan with no weekend planned production contained Production Data with a null actual value, the plan appeared as incomplete. This issue has been resolved. | TFS314711 |
Previously, when you modified the Asset Hierarchy context via the filter on the PLA Overview page, the graphs on the page were not updated. This issue has been resolved. | TFS313582 |
Previously, when you logged in as a user who was not a Super User, the Add button () was disabled in the Production Analyses section and you could not create Production Analyses from Production Loss Analyses. This issue has been resolved. | TFS311461 |
Previously, when you created a Production Plan and entered special characters in the Product Description field in the Production Profile, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS310568 |
Previously, when you loaded more than 1000 Production Events using the Production Loss Analysis Data Loader, the load failed. This issue has been resolved. |
|
Previously, when you viewed, on a device with a 1280x800 screen, in the Plan Details workspace for a Production Plan with more than two products, the products overlapped one another. This issue has been resolved. | TFS303935 |
Previously, when creating a Production Plan using the Production Plan Builder, if you used the Previous button to return to the Select Production Unit screen to add another product, the product you tried to add did not appear in the plan. This issue has been resolved. | TFS296018 |
Previously, when you accessed the PLA Application Settings in a localized version of GE Digital APM, the following issues occurred:
These issues have been resolved. |
|
Previously, when you built a time-based sequential Production Plan with two products, and then went back to the Select Production Unit screen and added another product, the new product did not appear on the Time-based Plan screen. This issue has been resolved. | TFS288262 |
Previously, in the Margins subsection of the Production Profile section, you could save two margins as default. This issue has been resolved. | TFS272303 |
Previously, when creating a Production Plan using the Production Plan Builder, if you navigated back to the Select Production Unit screen and modified your product selections, then new selections were not saved. This issue has been resolved. | TFS269910 |
Previously, when a PLA Production Event was created with a causing asset with no functional location and an RCA was created on that event, the RCA analysis did not appear on the RCA Overview page. This issue has been resolved. | TFS264201 |
Previously, when you created a Root Cause Analysis from a Production Plan that was imported using the Production Loss Analysis Data Loader, an error occurred. When you linked a period loss to one or more Production Events, the Event appeared more than once in the Production Events workspace. These issues have been resolved. | TFS244861 |
Previously, XI Readings in Production Data were not updated immediately. This issue has been resolved. | TFS242077 |
Previously, when you created a time-based Production Plan using Production Profiles with similar names and data, only Production Data for one of the Production Profiles appeared in the Production Data workspace. This issue has been resolved. | TFS178828 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
When you filter the information displayed on the PLA Overview page, the Include analyses without any assets? check box has been removed from the Enter Parameter Valueswindow. Analyses which are not linked to assets now appear at the Home level of the hierarchy. | TFS191179 |
Queries
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Now, when you run a query in unformatted mode, the results will still display formatted date values. Date values will always be displayed in the local time for the user. | TFS312282 |
When modifying an expression via the Advanced section of the Expression Builder window, in addition to modifying the expression directly, you can now modify previously made selections in the builder to update the expression. | TFS96555 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you exported to a file the results of a formatted query containing fields with the Long Time, Short Time, or Month Day format, the values in those fields were modified unexpectedly during export. This issue has been resolved. |
|
R Scripts
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
GE Digital APM now supports DeployR Open V8.0.0 and DeployR Enterprise V8.0.0. | TFS260853 |
Recommendation Management
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now filter the following lists in a recommendation by site reference: Reviewer Name, Assigned to Name, Final Approver Name, and Reevaluation Notification. | TFS283313 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you used Recommendation alerts in Hazards Analysis and SIS Management, email alerts were not generated automatically. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you have established Recommendation alerts in either Hazards Analysis or SIS, emails will be generated and sent as expected. | TFS323541 |
Previously, when you searched the Assigned To field for a user in a recommendation that had the same first name and last name as another user, duplicate results appeared with no clear way to identify each individual user. This issue has been resolved. Now, only one listing per user appears, even if they have the same first name and last name. | TFS321587 |
Previously, Recommendation Asset and Functional Location IDs were not populated automatically in a new recommendation without refreshing. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243732 |
Previously, on iOS devices, you could not consolidate a Recommendation unless the Recommendations pane was fully expanded. This issue has been resolved. The Recommendation pane now expands into full screen by default. | TFS152927 |
Record Manager
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you opened an MI Security User record in Record Explorer, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS313127 |
Previously, if you attempted to modify the state assignment of a record without having the necessary permissions, you could make selections to modify the state assignment, but, when you selected Done on the State Assignments window, an error message appeared and the modification was not saved. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you do not have the necessary permissions to modify the state assignment of a record, you cannot access the State Assignments window. | TFS297465 |
Previously, for date fields in datasheet, the date and time displayed in the calendar feature did not reflect the time zone of the specified user. This issue has been resolved. | TFS262328 |
Reference Documents
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The Reference Documents section has been enhanced to make it more intuitive. | TFS269182 |
In the Record Explorer, the Reference Documents menu that appears when you select the More button (), now displays the count of reference documents associated with a family. | TFS235754 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you created a new Reference Document record and uploaded a file to it, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS272014 |
Previously, when you tried to download a reference document via the GE Digital APM mobile application on a mobile device, the document did not download. This issue has been resolved. | TFS257895 |
Reliability Analytics
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now select the Report button to create reports on any page within an analysis. The reports open in a new browser tab in a printable format. This feature replaces the Reports workspace, which is now deprecated. |
|
In System Reliability, the last updated field beneath the Analysis summary title and scenario title is now updated in real time. | TFS251721 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you accessed the RA Overview page, the charts took longer than expected to load. This issue has been resolved. To enhance the performance of the RA Overviewpage, the default filter settings have been modified to include analyses with no asset. | TFS307052 |
Previously, in System Reliability, when you attempted to run a simulation, no progress was made and the simulation eventually failed. This issue has been resolved. The simulation is now completed without errors. | TFS301723 |
Previously, in Probability Distribution and Reliability Distribution, the y-coordinate value in the data table was incorrect. This issue has been resolved. |
|
Previously, on iPad mini devices, when you defined a TTF or TTR Distribution in System Reliability, the Properties section contained overlapping text. This issue has been resolved. | TFS294293 |
Previously, on iOS devices, when you accessed the Production Analysis Data Editor window, Reliability Distribution Data Editor window, or Reliability Growth Data Editor window, you could not modify data or use the scroll bars. These issues have been resolved. |
|
Previously, when you accessed a Comparison Plot for multiple Reliability Growth Analyses, the data points were incorrectly displayed with the values of the parent analyses and were labeled with the time unit of Days instead of the appropriate time unit. These issues have been resolved. | TFS290569 |
Previously, when you modified the date in the Analysis Period window of Reliability Growth, an error occurred, stating that the date was invalid if a date format other than the US date format was used. This issue has been resolved. | TFS278827 |
Previously, when you generated a Reliability Growth Analysis Report, the <Measurement> Rate Trend Plot did not appear in the Plots section. This issue has been resolved. | TFS278562 |
Previously, when you added an Application to a Spare, the default site in the Populations section was the user's default site instead of the site of the analysis. This issue has been resolved. | TFS271697 |
Previously, if a user whose culture setting was Chinese accessed Reliability Growth, the values in the left pane and the graph titles in the Analysis Summary workspace were not translated properly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS267228 |
Previously, in Automation Rules, the list of analyses in the Automation Rules section showed analyses that were created with data from all assets and events even though specific site(s) were selected. This issue has been resolved. |
|
Previously, in the Applications section of Spares Analysis, the Age Time Unit list was not localized. This issue has been resolved. | TFS252264 |
Previously, after selecting the Production Analysis tab, the Production Analysis list would produce a GET error and the list would not load. This issue has been resolved. | TFS246883 |
Previously, on the RA Overview page, the lists in each section displayed a maximum of six rows. This issue has been resolved. | TFS246695 |
Previously, when viewing the risks associated with a selected Action, under the Scenario Actions tab, the list of mitigated risks could overlap the Properties subsection if there were a large number of mitigated risks. This issue has been resolved. ` | TFS243997 |
Previously, in Reliability Growth, the down time overlap calculation used the time unit of days for down time regardless of what was selected in the analysis. This issue has been resolved. | TFS224271 |
Previously, in Production Analysis, you could modify a view-only site after opening it a second time. This issue has been resolved. | TFS224173 |
Previously, when using Production Analysis on an Android device, the browser reloaded when you renamed the production analysis, and an error occurred when data from the Analysis Data Tools was reloaded. This issue has been resolved. | TFS175552 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The queries previously used to display the SSRS reports in Reliability Analytics are no longer used, although they still appear in the Catalog. These queries are no longer necessary, as the reports now load in a new browser tab in a print preview format instead of loading in the Reports workspace, which is deprecated. |
|
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Action optimization in System Reliability Analysis. |
Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The RCM and FMEA overview pages have been redesigned to simplify the workflow. The following changes have been made to the RCM and FMEA overview pages:
|
|
You can now promote an RCM or FMEA Analysis template or an FMEA Asset template to an ASM template. Promoting an RCM or FMEA template to an ASM template creates risks and actions in a new strategy template from corresponding failure effects and recommendations in the RCM or FMEA template, respectively. Additionally, when you make subsequent changes to the original RCM or FMEA template, you can also promote those changes to the ASM template. |
|
Previously, the reports in RCM and FMEA were generated using asset data from the RCM FMEA Asset family. Now, the reports in RCM and FMEA are generated using asset data from the Asset Hierarchy. |
|
Two new fields, Failure Mechanism and Failure Mechanism Description, have been added to the RCM FMEA Failure Mode family. You can use these fields to specify and describe the processes that result in a failure. | TFS263484 |
Now, an analysis cannot exist without a linked asset. Similarly, you can only link virtual assets to RCM and FMEA analysis templates. Therefore, when you create an RCM or FMEA analysis, you are now required to link an asset before you can save the new analysis. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, any analyses in your database that are not linked to any assets in the asset hierarchy will be converted to analysis templates. |
|
You can now view the information on the number of processed, rejected, updated, and created records after using the RCM and FMEA Data Loaders. | TFS244076 |
The Template List query is now used to display the content in the Select Template window of the Apply Template Builder for RCM and FMEA. | TFS236437 |
You can now copy and paste nodes in RCM and FMEA templates. | TFS194959 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, in FMEA, when you created a recommendation by applying an existing template, the Recommendation Type field was blank. This issue has been resolved. | TFS317962 |
Previously, access to RCM and FMEA was based on one of the baseline Security Groups assigned to the user. Any user who was a member of a custom Security Group or Role was not able to access the RCM and FMEA modules even when they were assigned the required permissions. This issue has been resolved. Now, access is based on the security privileges assigned to families. | TFS298325 |
Previously, when you accessed an RCM analysis, and then drilled down to the associated failure mode, failure effect, and recommendation records, the datasheets were incorrectly classified as FMEA datasheets. This issue has been resolved. Now, each of these records has one datasheet that is used for both RCM and FMEA. | TFS271205 |
Previously, if you accessed an RCM or FMEA analysis template, selected the Team Members, Linked Assets, or Reference Documents tab, and then selected the Add button () to add an asset or function, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS258251 |
Previously, when you accessed a failure effect record and expanded the recommendation pane, sometimes the Add button () would not appear as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS256785 |
Previously, if you added a recommendation to a failure effect in RCM or FMEA, you needed to refresh the page to enable the Copy button (). This issue has been resolved. Now, the Copy button () is enabled immediately when you add a recommendation. | TFS252873 |
Previously, when you upgraded, duplicate asset groups were created from records in the RCM FMEA Asset family. This issue has been resolved. Now, you cannot create asset groups using RCM FMEA Asset family. | TFS252029 |
Previously, if you expanded the State Management dialog box, and then closed the active tab, the State Management dialog box remained expanded in view and incorrectly overlapped other open pages. This issue has been resolved. | TFS247514 |
Previously, Decision Logic families in RCM and FMEA were incorrectly site filtered. This issue has been resolved. Now, records in the Decision Logic families are not site filtered (i.e., they are available to all sites). | TFS246397 |
Previously, if you navigated back and forth between screens in the RCM template builder, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS237407 |
Previously, in RCM, if you promoted, consolidated, or superseded a recommendation that was added by applying a template using the Add To Analysis option, an error message appeared. This issue has been resolved, as the Add To Analysis option has been deprecated in V4.3.0.0.0. | TFS228771 |
Previously, when you created an RCM analysis and then applied a functional failure or a failure mode template, although the template was applied successfully, the template's parent node no longer appeared in the analysis tree structure in the left pane. This issue has been resolved. | TFS228220 |
Previously, if the Template Description field for RCM or FMEA templates had no value, the tab for the template page contained no label. This issue has been resolved. The tab now displays the template ID, which is a required field. | TFS221030 |
Previously, when you accessed the RCM or FMEA Recommendations reports through the Reports tab, the reports returned duplicate recommendations. This issue has been resolved. | TFS216821 |
Previously, when you created an RCM analysis from a template, the assets mapped to failure modes in the template builder were not placeholder assets selected in a previous step of the template builder as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS215037 |
Previously, in RCM, when creating a new failure mode, if you entered a value in any other field before entering a value in the Related Asset ID field, the Related Asset ID field became disabled. This issue has been resolved. | TFS206690 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
To enhance usability, the following items have been removed from the RCM and FMEA overview pages:
|
|
The ability to create or apply failure effect and recommendation templates has been removed. Any existing templates will be removed during upgrade. | TFS291206 |
The Site ID and Unit ID fields have been deprecated and removed from the baseline datasheet for the RCM FMEA Analysis family. These fields were deprecated because they are no longer needed on account of Site Filtering. | TFS231207 |
Now, an RCM analysis must be associated with an Asset from the hierarchy rather than an RCM FMEA Asset. Therefore, the Add To Analysis option from the Apply Template Builder wizard, which allows you to add an RCM FMEA Asset to the RCM analysis, has been deprecated. | TFS228771 |
The scenario for an RCM or FMEA analysis without a linked real asset has been removed. Now, you can no longer link virtual assets to an RCM or FMEA analysis. Any analyses without assets saved in your system will be converted to templates during upgrade. |
|
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Promoting RCM and FMEA analyses directly to templates. | TFS160858 |
Result Grid
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
On the Result Grid, you can now select the column heading to sort the column in ascending or descending order. | TFS257569 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, in the Result Grid of a query, for a user whose culture setting was a non-English setting, if a numeric filter value was entered with decimal comma (e.g.,123,45), the result did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS255307 |
Previously, on a Result Grid, when you entered a specific value to query (using the search feature), the cursor positioned itself back to the left of the typed characters. This issue has been resolved. | TFS210065 |
Risk Based Inspection
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
A new feature, Inventory Grouping, has been introduced in V4.3.0.0.0. Using this feature, you can create inventory groups in a process unit and add components to the inventory group. GE Digital APM then calculates the value in the Inventory Group Mass field for all the components that belong to the inventory group. The following changes have been made as part of the Inventory Grouping feature:
| TFS202260 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The PV Stress reference table now includes 296 additional records for Material Specification SA-387 and Code Year 2010 to cover information on various classes. | TFS315077 |
When you generate an RBI Recommendation for an Asset or an RBI Analysis, there is now a visual indication of whether the operation is still in progress or completed. | TFS297787 |
The Process Units tab has been added to the Risk Based Inspection Overview page, replacing the Corrosion Loops tab. The Process Units section displays a list of all Process Units related to the specified level of the Asset Hierarchy. To facilitate this enhancement, on the Asset Hierarchy page for a Functional Location, in the Risk section, the hyperlink in the Risk Based Inspection row displays the count of the Assets and Process Units (instead of Corrosion Loops, as previously) related to the selected Functional Location. |
|
The Piping Stress reference table now includes information on Construction Code ASME B31.1 and Code Year 2014, thus adding 17,286 records to the Piping Stress family. | TFS236586 |
You can now verify whether or not a toxic fluid is valid for RBI 581. A new field labeled Toxic Fluid Valid for 581 Analysis has been added to the following families:
| TFS221704 |
You can now log in to GE Digital APM as a Security User who can only access all the records in RBI, but cannot create, modify, or delete a record. To facilitate this enhancement, the following changes have been made:
| TFS190090 |
When you link an RBI Component or a PRD Component to a Corrosion Loop, in the Select RBI Components window, the Components appear in a flat list, instead of in the Asset Hierarchy. This allows you to easily locate a component without navigating through the hierarchy. To facilitate this enhancement, the Select RBI Components query in the Public\Meridium\Modules\Risk Based Inspection\Queries folder has been modified. | TFS187479 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The financial risk mapping for an RBI Criticality Analysis or RBI Pipeline Analysis now includes production loss in addition to maintenance cost. The consequence is calculated as the sum of the production loss and maintenance cost. To facilitate this change, the following policies have been modified:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following changes have been made to the Risk based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader:
| TFS255961 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
A new policy, RBI 580 Non-Intrusive Requirement, is now used to populate the Non-Intrusive Requirement Met check box on a Criticality Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. datasheet. As needed, you can modify the logic that is used to populate the check box by modifying the policy. | TFS252812 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Asset Risk Report now includes the Inspection Confidence value of the Inspection Strategy that is associated with an RBI Recommendation. To facilitate this enhancement, the following fields have been added to the RBI Recommendation family:
| TFS252656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
You can now perform bulk calculations for all RBI Criticality Analyses associated with a single asset, multiple assets, a Process Unit or a Corrosion Loop. Additionally, the Analysis Calculation window appears which displays information related to calculations, such as progress, assets, components, analyses, and completion statuses. You can also access the Schedule Logs page to view detailed information about the calculation process, and, for any failed analyses, a list of the required fields. | TFS250634 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
When you access the Inspection History of Criticality Other Damage Mech. Eval., the Inspections that are linked only to the selected Degradation Mecahnism (DM) now appear. The Inspections that are linked to the other DMs no longer appear. | TFS247792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The RBI_Components worksheet has been added to the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader workbook. This worksheet consolidates the following RBI Criticality Calculator Components worksheets, previously listed individually, into a single worksheet:
| TFS246415 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 580 Data Loader workbook, if you do not enter values in cells that correspond to fields required to calculate an analysis, then the analysis and related records are no longer created after you load data. | TFS204975 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
In an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, in the Risk Summary ID field, the option Consequence Driven is no longer available. Instead, for consequence-driven scenarios:
| TFS314724 |
The performance of an RBI 581 Risk Analysis calculation has been improved by removing the following policies:
|
|
In the Potential Degradation Mechanisms section for a component or a corrosion loop, a new column, Methodology Type, has been added to the grid, which displays the methodology type of each Potential Degradation Mechanism (PDM). In addition, when you select Add PDM:
Similarly, in the Degradation Mechanisms section of an RBI Criticality Analysis, RBI 581 Risk Analysis, RBI PRD Analysis, or RBI Pipeline Analysis, if you select the Add Item button ():
| TFS303556 |
Entering a value in the Furnished Cladding Thk field in an RBI 581 Risk Analysis is now mandatory when calculating an analysis linked to a cladded RBI Component. | TFS298087 |
You can now create a What-If Analysis for an RBI 581 Risk Analysis. | TFS278422 |
Integration between the RBI 581 and Thickness Monitoring modules has been enhanced. You can now use the Controlling Corrosion Rate of an Asset or Component that is defined in the associated Asset Corrosion Analysis in Thickness Monitoring to calculate the damage factor of an RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Damage Evaluation. To facilitate this enhancement, the following changes have been made:
| TFS258239 |
A new graph, RBI 581 ISO Risk Plot, has been added to various pages in RBI. The graph displays the SHE risk and financial risk of an RBI 581 Risk Analysis on a logarithmic scale. The low, medium, medium high, and high risk levels are marked on the graph based on the standards set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). You can also modify the graph settings by accessing the administrative settings for RBI. | TFS247846 |
When you access the Inspection History of a Degradation Mechanism Evaluation (DME) other than 581-Internal Lining Component Damage, and the DM belongs to RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Damage Evaluation, the Inspections linked to 581-Internal Lining Component Damage no longer appear. Similarly, when you access the Inspection History for 581-Internal Lining Component Damage, now only the Inspections that are linked to that DM appear. | TFS247792 |
In the Risk Based Inspection (RBI) 581 Data Loader workbook, if you do not enter values in cells that correspond to fields required to calculate an analysis, then the analysis and related records are no longer created after you load data. | TFS204975 |
Integration between RBI 581 and Inspection Management has been enhanced such that Inspections linked to an Asset are now assigned automatically to a Degradation Mechanism Evaluation (DME) associated with the same Asset. To facilitate this enhancement:
| TFS183442 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if the Material Type field in a PV Stress record contained a value, then the value in the Allowable Stress field in the following records was not populated.
This issue has been resolved. | TFS294107 |
Previously, if you decreased the size of the browser window, or zoomed out, the More Options button () on some pages in RBI did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS288933 |
Previously, the following issues existed in the documentation for Risk Based Inspection and RBI 581:
These issues have been resolved. |
|
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously, in a Criticality Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. record associated with a piping component, the value in the Pressure at Minimum Thickness field was calculated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS321456 | ||||||||||||
Previously, in a Criticality Ext. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. record, the value in the Corrosion Factor field was calculated incorrectly if the field values in the record satisfied one of the following conditions:
Due to this, the value in the Probability Category field was calculated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS321630 | ||||||||||||
Previously, when you calculated an RBI PRD Analysis, the value in the Recommended Inspection Interval field was calculated incorrectly and exceeded the maximum intervals defined for each Risk Category. This issue has been resolved. | TFS297079 | ||||||||||||
Previously, when you created an RBI analysis with a toxic consequence calculation for some toxic gases, and then reduced the inventory, if the resulting calculated Evaporation Rate was between 0 and 1, the consequence category was not calculated correctly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS294108 | ||||||||||||
Previously, if the Selected Corrosion Rate field in the Criticality Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. family was included in a query, and if you ran the query in a formatted mode, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS289821 | ||||||||||||
Previously, if you assigned an inspection that satisfied the following conditions to a Criticality Over Pressure Deg. Mech. Eval. record, then the value in the Probability of Failure on Demand field increased instead of decreasing or remaining the same:
Similarly, if you assigned an inspection that satisfied the following conditions to a Criticality Leak Deg. Mech. Eval. record, then the value in the Probability of Leak field increased instead of decreasing or remaining the same:
These issues have been resolved. If the inspection satisfies the aforementioned conditions, then the previous inspection date is used to calculate the value in the Weibull Updated Characteristic Life field. | TFS282032 | ||||||||||||
Previously, if you selected an RBI Component from a Corrosion Loop whose Source of Calculated Corrosion Rate field was set to Component, and then selected the Manage TML Groups button (), an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS268188 | ||||||||||||
Previously, on a Criticality RBI Pipeline Segment datasheet, in the Toxic Fluid field, if you selected a fluid that was valid for RBI 581, then an error message appeared stating that the fluid was not valid. This issue has been resolved. | TFS266963 | ||||||||||||
Previously, on a Criticality Calculator RBI Component datasheet, the Toxic Fluid Valid for 581 Analysis check box was not cleared even if:
Similarly, the Fluid Valid for 581 Analysis check box was not cleared even if you selected a process fluid valid for an RBI 581 Risk Analysis in the Process Fluid field and then cleared it, or selected a fluid that was not valid. These issues have been resolved. | TFS266963 | ||||||||||||
Previously, after assessing the mitigated risk, if you promoted the asset to Asset Strategy Management, in the Risks and Actions workspace, in the Risks section, the Strategy Mitigated Financial Risk value did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS264215 | ||||||||||||
Previously, if you calculated an analysis that contained a duplicate Risk Analysis Mapping record, the calculation completed successfully, although risk mapping to the Risk Matrix did not occur. This issue has been resolved. Now, if you try to calculate an analysis that contains a duplicate Risk Analysis Mapping record, the calculation fails, and a message appears in the log. | TFS261163 | ||||||||||||
Previously, the value in the UOM field for the Environmental Cost field in an RBI Consequence Evaluation and PRD Consequence Evaluation was Dollars Per Day instead of United States Dollar. This issue has been resolved. | TFS258494 | ||||||||||||
Previously, while assessing the mitigated risk for a DM, on the Risk Matrix window, if you selected Done multiple times, then multiple Risk Assessment records were created and linked to the DM. This issue occurred with DMs linked to any of the following analyses:
This issue has been resolved. | TFS258486 | ||||||||||||
Previously, on the Risk Matrix for each Degradation Mechanism, the Mitigated icon () appeared on the RBI Risk Matrix even when the Analysis was in the Created state. This icon incorrectly indicated to users that the promoted Analysis was in the Risk Completed state. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Mitigated icon () does not appear for created analyses. | TFS257876 | ||||||||||||
Previously, the Production Loss field was not mapped to the Financial Risk. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Production Loss field is mapped to the Financial Risk based on the value in the Production Loss Category. Also, the consequence value for the Financial Risk is now being calculated based on the sum of the Production Loss and Maintenance Cost. | TFS247358 | ||||||||||||
Previously, when viewing the RBI Corrosion Loop Data Loader error log, the entries in the log were not localized. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244810 | ||||||||||||
Previously, although Inspection History was not used to calculate the damage factor of a Damage Mechanism that belonged to Criticality Other Damage Mech. Eval. or Criticality Third Party Deg. Mech. Eval., you could assign Inspections to the Damage Mechanism. This issue has been resolved. | TFS238689 | ||||||||||||
Previously, for a component of type Storage Tank Bottom, in the Main section of a Criticality Consequence Evaluation, the value in the Lost Production Category field was not used to calculate the value in the Driving CoF field in the Analysis Results section of an RBI Criticality Analysis. Because of this, the value in the Structural Minimum Thickness field in an associated Criticality Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. was calculated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS236673 | ||||||||||||
Previously, for a Tank Shell component, the value in the Estimated Minimum Thickness field on a Criticality Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. datasheet was incorrect. Instead of considering the maximum value among the calculated minimum thickness and the value in the Structural Minimum Thickness field, the calculated minimum thickness value was used to populate the Estimated Minimum Thickness field. This issue has been resolved. | TFS236672 | ||||||||||||
Previously, if the value in the Consequence Category-Rolled Up field in an RBI Criticality Analysis record was E, then the value in the Structural Minimum Thickness field in an associated Criticality Int. Corr. Deg. Mech. Eval. record was 0, instead of 0.03. This issue has been resolved. | TFS236671 | ||||||||||||
Previously, the Susceptible to CUI field was required for Asset Grouping, even though Asset Grouping is obsolete in V4. This issue has been resolved. The Susceptible to CUI field has been removed from the following
| TFS205829 | ||||||||||||
Previously, when viewing the RBI 580 Data Loader error log, the entries in the log were not localized. This issue has been resolved. | TFS180046 | ||||||||||||
Previously, in the Asset Risk Report, values in some fields did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS154862 |
Description | Tracking ID | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previously , in an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, the Risk Summary ID and Risk Summary Description fields were blank for each of the following scenarios:
These issues have been resolved. |
| ||||||||||||||
Previously, in an RBI 581 Cracking Damage Evaluation or RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluation, if the value in the Number of Highest Effective Inspections field was 6, then inspection did not mitigate the risk during inspection planning. This issue has been resolved. Now, an inspection with a higher level of inspection confidence is applied to mitigate the risk. | TFS305531 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, in RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluation and RBI 581 Cracking Damage Evaluation records, if the value in the Number of Highest Effective Inspections field was a decimal number, during inspection planning, the value was rounded up to the next whole number before calculating the required level of inspection. Because of this, the values in the Number of Highest Effective Inspections and Total Damage Factor With Plan fields were incorrect. This issue has been resolved. | TFS301109 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, in an RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Evaluation record, the Selected BM Corrosion Rate and Selected Cladding Corrosion Rate fields did not contain Controlling Corrosion Rate in the list of values. This issue has been resolved. | TFS289821 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, after you calculated an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, the value in the Inspection Will Mitigate field was Yes (Y) instead of No (N) if both the following conditions were satisfied:
In addition, the following fields were not populated:
This issue has been resolved. | TFS279764 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, after you calculated an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, the value in the Coating Adjustment field in the associated RBI 581 External Cracking Damage Evaluation was calculated incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. (TS ID: 278793) | |||||||||||||||
Previously, if you copied an RBI 581 Risk Analysis that was linked to an RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Evaluation, the values in the Short Term Avg. Corr. Rate and Long Term Avg. Corr. Rate fields were not updated based on the corresponding values in the associated Asset Corrosion Analysis in Thickness Monitoring. This issue has been resolved. | TFS273402 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, on a Criticality Calculator RBI Component or RBI 581 Risk Analysis datasheet, the Toxic Fluid Valid for 581 Analysis check box was not cleared even if:
Similarly, the Fluid Valid for 581 Analysis check box was not cleared even if you selected a process fluid valid for an RBI 581 Risk Analysis in the Process Fluid field and then cleared it, or selected a fluid that was not valid. These issues have been resolved. | TFS266963 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, if you created a new RBI Component for an asset in RBI and then opened the Inspection Profile datasheet for that same asset in Inspection Management, the newly added component was not available in the drop down for the RBI Component field. This issue has been resolved. | TFS250358 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, in a Criticality RBI Component – Tank Bottom record, if the Has Release Prevention Barrier? check box was selected, then the value in the Maximum Fill Height in AST field in the associated RBI 581 Consequence Evaluation was blank. This issue has been resolved. The Maximum Fill Height in AST field is now populated with the value 0.25 feet. | TFS263718 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, Security Groups were not assigned security permissions to the RBI 581 Env Cracking Insp Recommendation Policy. In addition, in an Oracle database, Security Groups were not assigned security permissions to the following policies:
These issues have been resolved. Now, Security Groups have been assigned permissions to the policies as follows:
| TFS244390 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, although Inspection History was not used to calculate the damage factor of the following Damage Mechanisms (DMs), you could assign Inspections to Degradation Mechanism Evaluations (DMEs) of the following DMs:
| TFS238689 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, in the Degradation Mechanisms section of an RBI 581 Risk Analysis, if you selected the 581-Internal Component Lining Damage DM, the Inspection History button () was disabled. Because of this, you could not access the Inspection History of the DM. This issue has been resolved. | TFS238689 | ||||||||||||||
Previously, in an RBI 581 Thinning and Lining Evaluation, the following issues existed:
These issues have been resolved such that:
| TFS235903 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The following policies are no longer used in RBI:
| TFS305997 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Creating a bulk What-If analysis. | TFS73475 |
Reports
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
ou can now configure multiple GE Digital APM servers to a single report server. | TFS251776 |
Risk Matrix
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, in a Risk Matrix with a protection level slider, when a risk was closed and then reopened, the protection level would reset to 1. This issue has been resolved. Now, the protection level retains its value. | TFS283887 |
Roles
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
A new Security Role, MI APM Viewer, has been added. Members of this role can only view the records of all the workflows to which they have privileges and license to access. | TFS192977 |
Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Changes to node positions in RCA Event Diagrams and Logic Tree Diagrams are now automatically saved when you leave the corresponding section. | TFS293292 |
When importing existing Failure Modes and Hypotheses to a Logic Tree node, the Analysis Type list selection in the Import window is now set to the Analysis Type of the open Analysis by default. A No Analysis Type Assigned option has also been added to the Analysis Type list for analyses with no associated type. | TFS251781 |
The export quality of the Logic Tree and Event Diagram has been improved so that it is now more readable. | TFS251242 |
The RCA Overview page filter has been enhanced so that analyses with or without linked assets appear in the Asset Hierarchy at the Home level. When another asset level is selected in the hierarchy, only analyses with linked assets related to that asset appear. | TFS244498 |
You can now delete a Hypothesis from the Hypothesis List pane. | TFS239302 |
You can now import Failure Modes from Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to the Logic Tree diagram. To be available for import, Failure Modes must have an asset context which corresponds to one or more linked assets for the RCA Analysis. | TFS182851 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, after an analysis was published, you could still update and delete the analysis. This issue has been resolved. Controls to perform modifications to published analyses are now unavailable. | TFS316666 |
Previously, when you copied a Root Cause Analysis, the Team Members column appeared blank in the Analysis Summary workspace and in the Verifications pane. This issue has been resolved. | TFS316621 |
Previously, when you modified and saved a team member's role and then selected the Edit button (), the roles that you assigned to the members appeared incorrectly. This issue has been resolved. | TFS312180 |
Previously, when you applied version V4.2.0.2.0, Logic Trees with one Failure Mode and one Hypothesis would not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS300860 |
Previously, you could not save the RCA Logic Tree diagram after exporting it. If you were using Internet Explorer, the tree did not appear, or, if you were using Chrome, the Save As window did not appear. These issues have been resolved. | TFS267909 |
Previously, an internal server error appeared when you attempted to email users the Comprehensive Analysis Report in the Comprehensive Analysis Report section and Analysis Link section. | TFS260974 |
Previously, the tab counts were not displayed on the RCA Overview page for secured users. This issue has been resolved. | TFS260390 |
Previously, when a Functional Location (FLOC) in the hierarchy was linked to an analysis, all of the child elements for the selection were included in the linked assets list and had to be manually removed from the list one-by-one. This issue has been resolved. | TFS250659 |
Previously, for users with the Japanese culture setting, the comprehensive report of a Root Cause Analysis did not load. This issue has been resolved. | TFS |
Previously, the PlannedProductionvsLosses query returned incorrect data. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244498 |
Previously, when you accessed an Event Diagram or Logic Tree diagram via the GE Digital APM mobile application on a Microsoft Surface Pro device, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244102 |
Previously, when you selected the Definition tab on the Analysis Summary page of an RCA Template uploaded with the RCA Data Loader, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243417 |
Previously, when creating a new RCA Analysis and Logic Tree, the search results were no longer present when you navigated back to the Select Analysis/Template section of the Import window. This issue has been resolved. | TFS213338 |
Previously, when using the Edge or Internet Explorer browser, the entire logic tree was not displayed. This issue has been resolved. | TFS196446 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Emailing capability to notify and track changes in an Asset in an RCA. | TFS175610 |
Sending email notifications for alerts configured in RCA for Hypothesis Verifications. | TFS175610 |
Standard APM State Management functionality in RCA. | TFS63432 |
Rounds
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Selecting multiple nodes in the Route pane in Route Management. | TFS173671 |
Ad hoc inspection of a single asset. | TFS160740 |
Offline access to the five most recent Recommendations in Rounds. | TFS153853 |
Support for Bluetooth-connected barcode scanners. | TFS124935 |
Unlinking a Measurement Location from a Measurement Location Template. | TFS61751 |
Accessing a list of recent Routes. | TFS61638 |
Rounds Data Collection
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
A new Map query, Route Geolocation Data, is available in the baseline GE Digital APM Catalog. You can use this query to view the geolocation data that is saved for readings, recommendations, and photos. This query is supported by two new subqueries, Readings Geolocation data and Rounds Recommendation Geolocation. | TFS294770 |
Performance has been enhanced throughout Rounds Data Collection. As part of this enhancement, a change was made to the display of checkpoints on a filtered Route. Now, when you filter a Route, the number displayed in the Route Map pane to the left of the Asset ID reflects the order of the filtered list, rather than the order of the full list. | TFS251834 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you moved a Checkpoint from the Node Pin Board back to the Route Map pane at an asset header insertion point, the Checkpoint was not inserted at the expected location in the Route. This issue has been resolved. | TFS320571 |
Previously, when using the Internet Explorer or Microsoft Edge browser and a non-English culture user culture setting, when you selected the Next button () after entering a Checkpoint reading, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS312303 |
Previously, when entering numeric reading values with an iOS device, you could not enter a decimal point or comma. This issue has been resolved. | TFS320066 |
Previously, when you created a Route using a Template Group which contained Measurement Location Templates under conditions, duplicate checkpoints may have been created under the conditions. This issue has been resolved. | TFS302641 |
Previously, if a Route had a schedule defined at the Route level and all checkpoints on the Route also contained their own schedules which were due after the Route was due, the Route incorrectly appeared in the Due or Overdue lists on the RDC Overview page. If you attempted to open the Route, various additional issues occurred. These issues have been resolved. Now, in this scenario, the Route does not appear in the Due or Overduelists. |
|
Previously, when saving a Recommendation, only the values entered in the fields included on one of the two baseline Operator Rounds Recommendation offline forms was saved. If additional baseline or custom fields were added to the offline form, data entered in these additional fields was not saved. This issue has been resolved. | TFS289648 |
Previously, if your user time zone was different from the time zone of the device, the Overdue Items and Due Items lists on the RDC Overview page and the checkpoints displayed in a Route did not display the due checkpoints as expected. This issue has been resolved. | TFS283293 |
Previously, when using Rounds Data Collection on a Small Form Factor device, various information on the screen was not refreshed after you completed an action such as marking a Route as Done or subscribing to a Route for offline access. This issue has been resolved. | TFS269277 |
Previously, on Small Form Factor Devices, the Scan button () was not displayed on the RDC Overview page or when viewing a Route. This issue has been resolved. | TFS269256 |
Previously, in the Assigned Routes section of the RDC Overview page, if you searched in the Status column for in-progress routes, no routes were found, even if there were routes with the status In Progress. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244553 |
Previously, geolocation data was not saved for readings taken for Lubrication Requirements. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243670 |
Rounds Designer
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
A new field, Capacity Unit of Measure, has been added in Lubrication Requirement and Lubrication Requirement Template records to replace the existing field, which has been deprecated. The new field contains a drop-down list, populated by the MI_LM_REFERENCES system code table, from which you can select an appropriate Unit of Measure. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, this field will be populated automatically with a reference to the unit of measure that corresponds to the value in the deprecated Capacity Unit of Measure field. Therefore, prior to upgrading your database, we recommend that you review the values in the Capacity Unit of Measure field to consolidate any near-matches, and to ensure that corresponding values exist in the MI_LM_REFERENCES System Code Table. |
|
When using a Windows Mobile Device to upload readings, if the selected Route is incomplete, then, on the Sync Data screen, a reminder now appears stating that Routes must be marked as complete before they can be uploaded. | TFS288359 |
On the Lubrication Requirement and Lubrication Requirement Template datasheets, the Lubricant Manufacturer field now appears above the Lubricant field. Because the available lubricants are filtered by the specified manufacturer, this enhancement streamlines the creation of Lubrication Requirements. | TFS279041 |
To facilitate a comprehensive lubricant management program, the following fields have been added to the Lubricant family and are displayed on the default datasheet:
|
|
The Requires Equipment Shutdown field has been added in the following locations to help with designing Routes:
| TFS277571 |
The Checkpoint ID field is now populated automatically when you create a new Checkpoint. | TFS273458 |
Performance when changing the order of checkpoints on a route has been significantly improved. To facilitate this enhancement, the route sequence is now stored in a reference table, and the Sequence fields on Checkpoint, Checkpoint Condition, Measurement Location, and Lubrication Requirement records have been deprecated. To support this enhancement for Windows Mobile handheld devices, the following changes have been made:
|
|
You can now use the Rounds Readings Data Loader to load readings related to Lubrication Requirements. | TFS240866 |
The Rounds data loaders now use the standard date format yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss. This change affects the following fields:
| TFS232995 |
The Recommendation Error Details field has been added to the Operator Rounds Recommendation In Error family to provide details about why the creation of a recommendation has failed. The field also appears on the Operator Rounds Recommendation in Error datasheet. | TFS227153 |
You can now centrally manage component types and subtypes for Lubrication Requirements. To facilitate this enhancement:
|
|
You can now centrally manage method types and subtypes for Lubrication Requirements. To facilitate this enhancement:
|
|
A new entity family Lubricant Manufacturer has been added to store information about the manufacturer of a lubricant. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, a new Lubricant Manufacturer record will be created for each value in the Manufacturer field in Lubricant records prior to upgrading, and the value will be replaced with a reference to the corresponding Lubrication Manufacturer record. Therefore, prior to upgrading your database, we recommend that you review the values in the Manufacturer field in Lubricant records to consolidate any near-matches. | TFS213441 |
The Priority field in Lubrication Requirement and Lubrication Requirement Template records now contains a dropdown list from which you can select the appropriate priority. The list is populated by a new system code table, MI_LUBR_PRIORITY. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, a new entry in the system code table will be added during the upgrade for each value in the Priority field in Lubrication Requirement and Lubrication Requirement Template records prior to upgrading. The value in those fields will be replaced with a reference to the corresponding system code table entry. Therefore, prior to upgrading your database, we recommend that you review the values in the Priority field to consolidate any near-matches. | TFS209334 |
Compliance tracking is now enabled for Lubrication Requirements. To facilitate this enhancement, on the RD Overview and RDC Overview pages, the graph summarizing compliance has been updated to include Lubrication Requirements and renamed to Checkpoint Schedule Compliance (excluding conditional checks). | TFS189147 |
The compliance tracking schedule settings have been moved to the Rounds Designer section of Application Settings. | TFS185936 |
In the Lubrication Requirement Template datasheet, the following fields have been removed:
| TFS185322 |
For Lubrication Requirement records that were created based on a Lubrication Requirement Template, if the template is updated, you can now update the corresponding Lubrication Requirement records with the changes using the Update Existing Checkpoints feature. | TFS173791 |
The Measurement Location Data Capture report has been enhanced to display conditional Measurement Locations. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0, if you have modified the queries used in this report, then you will need to copy the new baseline queries and reapply your modifications to take advantage of this enhancement. | TFS125501 |
A new tab, Lubricants, has been added to the Rounds Designer Overview page. You can use this tab to view and access the Lubricant records in your database, as well as to add a new Lubricant. | TFS61071 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, after you deleted multiple Routes, if your database contained a large number of Routes, then the Routes tab took a long time to load. If you were using the Internet Explorer 11 browser, then the list may have not loaded. This issue has been resolved. | TFS323837 |
Previously, when a user with access to multiple sites added an existing checkpoint to a Route assigned to a specific site, in some cases the checkpoint was not added to the Route, due to the checkpoint having a different site. This issue has been resolved. Now, the list of available checkpoints is filtered to show only those that match the site of the Route. | TFS321212 |
Previously, when you synchronized a Windows Mobile device, if a Route contained inactive checkpoints with active child checkpoints under conditions, no checkpoints were downloaded to the mobile device. This issue has been resolved. | TFS317620 |
Previously, when you loaded Checkpoint Templates and Template Groups using the Rounds Template Data Loader, the Checkpoint Templates were not sequenced correctly within the Template Groups. This issue has been resolved. | TFS313959 |
Previously, when you navigated away from the Schedule section of a Measurement Location with unsaved changes, the changes in the date fields were lost if you selected Cancel on the You have unsaved changes dialog box. This issue has been resolved. | TFS304316 |
Previously, if you added a value to an Allowable Values record that was longer than the configured field length for the Allowable Value field, no warning appeared and the value was not saved. This issue has been resolved. | TFS293154 |
Previously, in the Strategy section on the <Asset Name> page for an asset, the number of Routes shown in the hyperlink for Rounds Designer was incorrect. This issue has been resolved. | TFS274335 |
Previously, if you selected the Mark Done button on a Route, but then closed the Mark Route Done window without actually marking the Route as Done, if you then selected the filter button () in the Route Map pane, the filter options did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS270906 |
Previously, when you used the Update Existing Checkpoints button to update measurement locations with changes from their source template, if a template included numeric health indicator limits, an error may have occurred and some measurement locations may not have been updated. This issue has been resolved. | TFS266937 |
Previously, in certain scenarios, if you cleared all readings taken for a Route, a “Route Marked Done�? message appeared when you attempted to open the Route again. This issue has been resolved. | TSF264270 |
Previously, if you created a route without adding a value in the Route ID field, the route saved successfully, but you were unable to access it again from the RD Overview page. This issue has been resolved. Now, Route ID is a required field, and you cannot save a route that only has blank spaces as the value in the Route ID field. | TSF256121 |
Previously, if you created a Lubrication Requirement from a Lubrication Requirement Template, the values in the Description, Lubricant, and UOM fields in the Lubrication Requirement Template were not copied into the new Lubrication Requirement. This issue has been resolved. | TFS246886 |
Previously, when using the Rounds Routes Data Loader, if you tried to load an existing checkpoint and identified that it was linked to a route that was different than the route to which the checkpoint was already linked, the data for the checkpoint would not be updated, yet no warning message was added to the log text for that data import job. This issue has been resolved. Now, a warning message is added to the log text, indicating that the update for the checkpoint was skipped. | TFS244709 |
Previously, when you created a checkpoint (i.e., Measurement Location or Lubrication Requirement) based on a template, the Non-Compliance Date Interval was not copied to the checkpoint. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243768 |
Previously, if no Lubrication Requirement Template records existed in the database, an error occurred when you attempted to save a new Lubrication Requirement record. This issue has been resolved. | TFS243335 |
Schedule Logs
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
On the Operations Manager page, the Scheduling button has been renamed to Schedule Logs. | TFS255964 |
You can now download the log files for the tasks that are successfully completed or failed. A new download button () has been added to the Successful and Failed tabs of the Schedule Logs page. | TFS249018 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if a scheduled job failed and the error message contained more than 255 characters, then the scheduled job remained in the In Progress section and did not move to the Failed section. This issue has been resolved. | TFS297267 |
Previously, when you modified the value in the Occurrences box on the Edit Schedule window, the modified value did not appear in the summary of the schedule. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you modify the value in the Occurrences box, the updated value appears in the summary of the schedule. | TFS280117 |
Scripts
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
The field that you select in the Field to Classify box in the Workbench workspace now appears as the first column in the Test Results workspace. | TFS270668 |
The process for training machine learning scripts for predicting non-Boolean values has been streamlined so that, now, when you reject the script’s prediction (by selecting ) for a particular record, if the value in the specified Field to Classify matches a value in the standard list, the Actual column is populated with that standard list value by default. | TFS267163 |
Any user who is a member of the MI Cognitive User Security Group can now create, configure, and test General scripts. In addition, the Workbench, Test Results, and History workspaces are now available when working with a General script. | TFS263819 |
A new tab, Statistics, has been added for a Machine Learning scripts. In this section, you can view a summary of the records that have been reviewed and incrementally trained, such as the number of records that were initially predicted correctly and incorrectly. | TFS262962 |
If a query contains columns configured as a hyperlinks, the Test Results tab now displays the hyperlink. This feature allows you to easily access associated records while testing or training a script. | TFS260533 |
If the query or dataset specified for a script is modified, the related information in the Workbench workspace is now automatically refreshed upon navigating between tabs. For example, if you modify a query or dataset and then return to the Workbench workspace, you do not need to refresh the browser to see the updated information. | TFS259375 |
Previously, when you navigated between the Test Results workspace and another workspace or page, the results displayed in the Test Results workspace were always recalculated, even if no changes impacting the results were made. Usability in this area has been enhanced such that the results are now recalculated only when the query or values in the Workbench workspace have been changed. | TFS258913 |
In the Workbench workspace, the value in the Query or Dataset box now appears as a hyperlink that you can select to open the corresponding query or dataset in a new tab. | TFS258444 |
In the Workbench workspace, you can now specify which columns from a query or data set you want to use as inputs to a Machine Learning or Fuzzy Logic script. | TFS256631 |
To clarify the purpose of these fields, the following labels have been changed in the Workbench workspace:
| TFS256631 |
In the Test Results workspace of a script, each row now contains a check box that you can clear if you want to exclude certain rows from incremental training. | TFS244021 |
You can now use a dataset to supply the values for testing or training a script. | TFS237075 |
A new family, Classifier Training History, has been added to store the ratings specified by users when they incrementally train a machine learning script. Data from this family is used to display training statistics on the Statistics tab when viewing a script and on the Cognitive Analytics Overview page. | TFS258771 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when you selected the History tab of a Machine Learning script that has no training data, the Test Results tab became enabled, and you could test the data provided in the Query or Dataset box, which produced erroneous predictions. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you select the History tab of a Machine Learning script that has no training data, the Test Results tab remains disabled, and you cannot test the script until training data has been added. | TFS244535 |
Previously, when you created a Machine Learning script and changed its result column from a column that contains Boolean values to a column that contains character values, after testing the script, a blank drop-down list appeared when you rejected the script's prediction and selected the corresponding cell in the Actual column. This issue has been resolved. Now, when you select the cell in the Actual column, the values available from the standard list appear. | TFS241612 |
SIS Management
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now print the report for an SIS Trip Report record from the page for the selected trip report. The report displays the summary of the SIS Trip Report and its associated records. | TFS315563 |
You can now create a Recommendation for an Instrumented Function whose SIL Assessment is associated with a LOPA Assessment, and then promote the Recommendation to ASM. | TFS301283 |
You can now derive a qualitative risk rank mapping for an Instrumented Function in SIS Management using the values calculated in LOPA. | TFS301279 |
You can now create a Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) in the LOPA module, and then link it with an Instrumented Function for which you want to assess the required Safety Integrity Level (SIL). To facilitate this enhancement, a new family, LOPA Assessment, has been added to store the SIL Assessment values for Instrumented Functions. When you upgrade to V4.3.0.0.0:
|
|
When you delete an SIL Analysis, the Protective Instrument Loops associated with the SIL Analysis are deleted only if the elements in the loop are not associated with other Protective Instrument Loops belonging to different SIL Analyses. This ensures that shared elements are not deleted, which may then result in incorrect calculations in other associated loops. | TFS275155 |
A new Security Group, MI SIS Viewer, has been added. This group has View permissions for all the Entity and Relationship families used in SIS Management module. | TFS190113 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, when importing project files from exSILentia in which the value in the Test Architectural Constraints field in the loop data was IEC 61508 : 2010 tables [per 61511-1 11.4.5], an error occurred and data did not get imported. This issue was caused because the value for the Test Architectural Constraints field in the Protective Instrument Loop record was populated with the description for the system code IEC 61508 : 2010 from the System Code Table MI_ARCHITECTURE_CONSTRAINT. This issue has been resolved. Now, the Test Architectural Constraints field is populated with the ID of the system code (i.e., IEC 61508 : 2010). | TFS323298 |
Previously, in the loop diagram for a Protective Instrument Loop that had multiple Final Element Groups associated with a Final Element System, the Final Element Groups appeared disconnected from the Final Element System when the loop was not in the Design state. This issue has been resolved. | TFS320316 |
Previously, when assessing SIL using the Risk Matrix Internal method, the maximum risk value across all categories was incorrectly calculated, resulting in incorrect calculation of Mitigated Risk Rank. This issue has been resolved. | TFS263178 |
Previously, when you attempted to create or view a loop diagram, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS248237 |
Previously, in the Risk Matrix for a Risk Matrix Internal assessment of an Instrumented Function, same values were displayed for the mitigated and unmitigated risk ranks. This issue has been resolved. Now, the correct values for mitigated and unmitigated risk ranks appear. | TFS247706 |
Previously, in the Common Cause Failure subsection of an Instrumented Function, the Add button () to add a related Instrumented Function appeared although there was no Common Cause Failure. This issue has been resolved. | TFS244917 |
Previously, when you create a Process Hazards Analysis (PHA) Internal record, the View Risk Matrix button appeared on the datasheet before the datasheet was saved. This issue has been resolved. Now, the View Risk Matrix button is enabled only when you select the Cause-Consequence pair for which you want to view the Risk Matrix. | TFS244914 |
Previously, if you did not have license for the module or security permission for a family, you were redirected to the Access Denied page without an error message. Now, an error message appears. | TFS244583 |
Previously, on the SIS Overview page, in the SIS Trip Reports section, data did not appear according to the site assigned to the user. This issue has been resolved. | TFS240839 |
Previously, in a Proof Test report, the steps did not appear in order. This issue has been resolved. | TFS230361 |
Previously, when exporting data to Exida using the Internet Explorer browser, if you attempted to cancel the export process, two Cancel buttons appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS228892 |
Previously, the following areas were not localized:
These issues have been resolved. |
|
Previously, when you changed the SIL mode of an external assessment, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS209839 |
Previously, the Print Template and Perform Proof Test buttons appeared on the Proof Test datasheet. This issue has been resolved. Now, these buttons appear only on the Proof Test Task datasheet. | TFS209507 |
Previously, when you attempted to create a new SIS Trip Report, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS207037 |
Previously, on the Final Element Group datasheet which contained identical Final Elements, the ATI / PVST Interval, the ATI / PVST Interval UOM, and the ATI / PVST Automatic/Manual fields were enabled irrespective of the type device contained in the final elements. This issue has been resolved. Now, you can select the ATI / PVST Enabled field to enable the ATI / PVST Interval, the ATI / PVST Interval UOM, and the ATI / PVST Automatic/Manual fields only if the final elements in the group contained a device of type Remote Actuated Valve. | TFS197057 |
Previously, when you created an Instrumented Function, the datasheet ID did not appear on the datasheet. This issue has been resolved. | TFS178518 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now create a Proven In Use Justification record, which stores details on the basis for use of a Protective Instrument Device that is associated with any of the following subsystems:
| TFS311414 |
Systems and Tags
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Viewing trends for multiple OPC Tags simultaneously (i.e., the Process Data Viewer feature in V3). | TFS62299 |
Thickness Monitoring
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now enter a value in the Historical Sequence field in a Thickness Measurement record using the Thickness Monitoring (TM) Equipment or Thickness Monitoring (TM) Functional Location Data Loader by adding a column on the Measurements worksheet in the data loader workbook. | TFS305039 |
The performance of the Thickness Monitoring (TM) Equipment Data Loader and the Thickness Monitoring (TM) Functional Location Data Loader has been improved by allowing multiple batches to load simultaneously. | TFS284672 |
The Remaining Life graph on the TM Overview page and the Remaining Life pie chart in the Remaining Life section have been updated to calculate and to display the remaining life from the current day, instead of the Measurement Last Taken Date. | TFS251669 |
You can now perform a bulk analysis of TM Corrosion Analyses from the Assets tab of the Thickness Monitoring Overview page. The Bulk Analyze window displays information related to calculations such as progress, assets, components, analyses, and completion statuses. You can also access a log to view detailed information about the calculation process, and, for any failed analyses, a list of the required fields. | TFS250633 |
The Piping Stress reference table now includes information on Construction Code ASME B31.1 and Code Year 2014, thus adding 17,286 records to the Piping Stress family. | TFS236586 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, if you customized the query and changed the order of the columns on the Assets and Asset Requiring a Calculation tabs on the Thickness Monitoring Overview page, and then attempted to complete a bulk analysis, the analysis calculation failed. This issue has been resolved. The bulk analyze process is no longer dependent upon the order of the tabs on the Thickness Monitoring Overview page. | TFS309530 |
Previously, on the Analysis Overview page, if you changed the value in the Analysis Type box in the Remaining Life section, and then selected the TMLs tab, the value selected in the Analysis Type box was not retained. This issue has been resolved. | TFS305793 |
Previously, if the length of the Equipment ID of an Equipment exceeded 50 characters, you could not calculate the Asset Corrosion Analyses linked to the Equipment. This issue has been resolved. | TFS288981 |
Previously, if you decreased the size of the browser window, or zoomed out, the More Options button () on the Asset Summary page did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS288933 |
Previously, when a custom rule was configured for calculating a measurement value, if you entered multiple readings and then attempted the calculation, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. Now, calculations complete even if a custom rule is added to the calculation. | TFS260621 |
Previously, on the Analysis Overview page, in the Remaining Life section, the first time that you selected the <=5 section of the Remaining Life chart, no TMLs appeared. This issue has been resolved. | TFS255880 |
Previously, when a user’s Thickness Monitoring Human Resource role was either added or removed, the values in the dropdown for the Measurement Taken By field in the Measurements section did not appear, and the user was forced to restart IIS to see the values. This issue has been resolved. Now, a user with a recently added or deleted Human Resource role can successfully choose a value from the Measurement Taken By dropdown without restarting IIS. | TFS243504 |
Previously, on a Thickness Measurement Location datasheet, if you selected API 653 in the Design Code field, then no values appeared in the Code Year (Allowable Stress Lookup), Material Grade, and Material Specification fields. This issue is resolved by including the tank stress data related to API 653, thus adding 29 records. | TFS230489 |
Previously, if you had multiple tabs open in Thickness Monitoring, and you entered data in the Custom field on the Measurement Data Entry page, and then closed the Measurement Data Entry tab quickly, an error occurred. This issue has been resolved. | TFS226463 |
Previously, on MI Asset Report, the Thickness Monitoring Summary section did not properly round the Remaining Life and the Controlling Corrosion rate fields to the ten-thousandth. This issue has been resolved. | TFS213483 |
Previously, when you relocated a TML to a different TML group or asset, an error occurred even though the calculations completed successfully. This issue has been resolved. | TFS206752 |
Previously, when calculating a TML that has a Remaining Life value less than or equal to 0, an error occurred while attempting to calculate the Retirement Date. This error occurred because the value in the Remaining Life Factor field was less than or equal to zero (0). This issue has been resolved. Now, if the value in the Remaining Life Factor field is less than or equal to zero (0), the value in the Retirement Date field will be set to the value in the Measurement Taken Date field of the most recent Thickness Measurement. Otherwise, if the value in the Remaining Life Factor field is greater than zero (0), the value in the Retirement Date field will be set to the sum of the Measurement Taken Date field value plus the Remaining Life Factor value. | TFS205907 |
Previously, on the Nominal Measurement window, the time in the measurement fields was incorrectly populated, which also occasionally caused errors in date fields. This issue has been resolved. Now, the default time applied to all fields on the Nominal Measurement window is midnight (00:00:00). This new setting also applies to the Add Measurement function on in the TMLs section and the measurement data entry window. Values entered on the Measurement Data Entry window, while using the common Measurement Taken date field, now displays the correct time of 00:00:00. | TFS156910 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Corroded Area Measurements. | TFS101752 |
Dataset integration with dataloggers. | TFS83553 |
Color Coding Preferences. | TFS70840 |
Exporting data to Excel via the TM Dataloggers interface. |
Units of Measure and Conversions
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Two new units of measurement, dL/g and G/MOL has been added to the Units of Measure and Conversions feature of Configuration Manager. | TFS240868 |
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
You can now use Units of Measure and Conversions in Configuration Manager. | TFS247786 |
Users
Description | Tracking ID |
---|---|
Previously, date values could be set unexpectedly to the time zone of the browser used to access GE Digital APM, rather than to the time zone associated with the logged in Security User. This issue has been resolved. | TFS261939 |
Previously, when you added a user in the Team Members section and the user had a photo in their corresponding Human Resource record, the user was added to the Team Member section but the photo of the user did not appear. This issue has been resolved. | TFS282811 |